To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
I guess this means that homosexual AIDS patients will go to the back of the line. /sarc
6 posted on
04/25/2006 9:27:52 AM PDT by
garv
To: garv
"I guess this means that homosexual AIDS patients will go to the back of the line."/sarcasm
and, the elderly should be shuffled far, far back in the line since we all know its all down hill for them anyway...../sarcasm
12 posted on
04/25/2006 9:32:14 AM PDT by
cherry
To: garv
"I guess this means that homosexual AIDS patients will go to the back of the line. /sarc"
Your /sarc tag indicates you already know the answer to that one.
In addition, a BC Human Rights tribunal has ruled that the health care system must pay for "sexual reassignment surgery" for transsexuals.
http://www.tgcrossroads.org/news/archive.asp?aid=688
To: garv
I guess this means that homosexual AIDS patients will go to the back of the line."
They have priority...
17 posted on
04/25/2006 9:38:57 AM PDT by
Paisan
To: garv
I guess this means that homosexual AIDS patients will go to the back of the line. /sarcHave you ever got that right! (The sarcasm, I mean)
Still and all, what if the patient is an overweight, cigarette smoking Muslim? Or an overweight sot of a queer? Will/can they be denied treatment?
18 posted on
04/25/2006 9:40:09 AM PDT by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: garv
I guess this means that homosexual AIDS patients will go to the back of the line. /sarcHa ha?
Give it a shot; see you in jail.
The best way to nurture contempt for laws generally, is to pass laws like "if you ask that question, you go to jail".
None of these doctors, presumably all intelligent, will ever, ever ask this question or address this glaring and egregious inconsistency:
Indeed, why not apply the same criterion to perverts?
50 posted on
04/25/2006 10:40:09 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson