It won't actually say that on the card, and I don't think Bush has "contempt" for the American worker. But Bush really needs to stop using that phrase "jobs Americans won't do." That terminology implies that some Americans may be too soft or too lazy to do certain jobs. Instead, his speech writers need to use this terminology: "jobs that Americans don't want to do." There's a subtle but importance difference in those phrases. The revised terminology doesn't imply that Americans are soft or lazy. It just says they don't want to do the job, for whatever reason and the reason doesn't matter.
I think the truth is in between Bush's position and Schlaffly's position: there aren't enough Americans who want to do some jobs to keep certain industries running at the current size of these industries.
What do you think of this change in terminology, Sinkspur?