1 posted on
04/24/2006 3:48:17 PM PDT by
dukeman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: dukeman
Queer or fag is a more accurate description.
2 posted on
04/24/2006 3:52:50 PM PDT by
frankiep
To: dukeman
The individuals previously mislabeled with the offensive term "homosexuals" shall now be known as "differently normal".
3 posted on
04/24/2006 3:53:13 PM PDT by
Sender
(“The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names.” – Old Chinese proverb)
To: All
Renaming it doesn't change it now does it?
4 posted on
04/24/2006 3:53:20 PM PDT by
broadway
To: dukeman
The politically correct term is now "butt buddies".
To: dukeman
He's so offended by the idea he doesn't even want to see the word in print!
6 posted on
04/24/2006 3:56:43 PM PDT by
manwiththehands
("'Rule of law'? We don't need no stinkin' rule of law! We want AMNESTY, muchacho!")
To: dukeman
'Other disallowed terms include immigrant, Asian, man and wife, mixed race, West Indian and asylum seeker'
This is beyond the merely weird into the realm of the surreal.
To: dukeman
"The Lord Chancellor is facing accusations of political correctness after banning the word homosexual from official documents in his department."
Thats a great first step, call them queer, thats what they are.
Gay wont work either. Gay means happy, last I knew queers weren't very happy.
Queer means "odd" and that fits perfectly.
9 posted on
04/24/2006 4:01:36 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Juan Williams....Proof that Liberal stupidity is an STD.)
To: dukeman
In these days, telling the simple truth is a revolutionary act.
Potentially offending someone is far more grave than the truth could ever be.
11 posted on
04/24/2006 4:02:53 PM PDT by
Sometimes A River
(Bush stifles speech to appease Chinese butchers)
To: dukeman
With today's decidedly western homo theme of Brokeback Mountain, I have taken to using "Rump-Rangers" to properly reference homosexuals.
15 posted on
04/24/2006 4:06:26 PM PDT by
kimoajax
(Rack'em & Stack'em)
To: All
"It is important to recognise that the term homosexuality is considered inappropriate by many gays and lesbians today." This drive ME nuts!!! Lesbians ARE gay; the term is "lesbians and HOMOSEXUALS"!! Lesbians are female, homosexuals are male! Duh! And, they are BOTH GAY!
To: dukeman
What about "bisexual?" Shouldn't that be changed to "half-gay," or is that too diminutive?
18 posted on
04/24/2006 4:09:17 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: dukeman
An unwillingness to describe the behavior indicates their underlying belief that the behavior is wrong.
19 posted on
04/24/2006 4:10:39 PM PDT by
Ben Mugged
(If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier.)
To: dukeman
Hey, Lord Chancellor:
![](http://guigo666.free.fr/comic/conneries/you're%20a%20homo.jpg)
21 posted on
04/24/2006 4:12:02 PM PDT by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
To: dukeman
O good Lord...............
To: dukeman
...and yet, strangely enough, the British still insist on calling meatballs "Faggots"...
27 posted on
04/24/2006 4:13:28 PM PDT by
Skibane
To: dukeman
Homosexuality should be stricken as it is an offensive term to fanny bandits.
29 posted on
04/24/2006 4:14:40 PM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
To: dukeman
32 posted on
04/24/2006 4:17:22 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
To: dukeman
Nancy Poofters?
Friends of Dorothy?
Queen Marys?
33 posted on
04/24/2006 4:18:27 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: dukeman
34 posted on
04/24/2006 4:20:50 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: dukeman
Lord Falconer has ordered for the word to be removed on the grounds that it may be considered offensive. Maybe Lord Falconer can remove the homosexuals because the are offensive.
37 posted on
04/24/2006 4:24:41 PM PDT by
Major_Risktaker
("If a fence doesn't work then why does Bush have one around the White House?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson