Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lord Chancellor bans use of word “homosexual” [U.K.]
PinkNews.uk ^ | 4/24/06 | Marc Shoffman

Posted on 04/24/2006 3:48:15 PM PDT by dukeman

The Lord Chancellor is facing accusations of political correctness after banning the word “homosexual” from official documents in his department.

Lord Falconer has ordered for the word to be removed on the grounds that it “may be considered offensive.”

The ban comes after a report commissioned by the Department for Constitutional Affairs to analyse how well diversity rules are obeyed when selecting judges.

Academics from the Queen Mary college compiled the report and concluded, “It is important to recognise that the term homosexuality is considered inappropriate by many gays and lesbians today.”

They claimed that gay charity Stonewall regards the word as derogatory, “It originates from a medical definition when same-sex attraction was construed as mental illness.' The report said “it should no longer be used in official documentation. Stonewall recommends that ‘lesbian, gay and bisexual’ is a more appropriate term.”

A spokesman for Lord Falconer's Department for Constitutional Affairs told the Mail on Sunday, “The equal opportunities statement in the guide to applicants has been changed to reflect good practice in line with the recommendation in the report.”

The wording has been changed to ask for applications from “people in those groups which are currently represented in relatively small numbers.”

It previously said “the Lord Chancellor pays no regard to sexual orientation and has made it clear that homosexuality is not a bar to appointments'.

David Conway of the Civitas think tank told the paper, “I am offended that the homosexual lobby has appropriated the use of the word gay. But no one listens to me, or to anyone else who complains that they can no longer use the word because it has been taken over by a single issue group.

“This is a word game that can go on for ever. It's another wrong turn over political correctness by a Government which has made many.”

Other disallowed terms include immigrant, Asian, man and wife, mixed race, West Indian and asylum seeker.

A spokesman from Stonewall told PinkNews.co.uk the group has never said the term “homosexual” should never be used, “We usually say the accepted best practice is to use the words lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender instead of homosexual which doesn’t directly describe the people.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: censorship; homosexualagenda; language; lavendermafia; pc; politicalcorrectness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: dukeman
Hey, Lord Chancellor:


21 posted on 04/24/2006 4:12:02 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

O good Lord...............


22 posted on 04/24/2006 4:12:09 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
What about "bisexual?" Shouldn't that be changed to "half-gay," or is that too diminutive?

That's where we get the term "half-a-fag"

23 posted on 04/24/2006 4:12:20 PM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: frankiep
Queer or fag is a more accurate description.

The English smoke fags (cigarettes).

24 posted on 04/24/2006 4:12:48 PM PDT by llevrok (Take me to your blender !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

But a "fag" is a cigarette in the UK.


25 posted on 04/24/2006 4:12:50 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
What about "bisexual?"

As a wise man once said, they're just kidding themselves.

26 posted on 04/24/2006 4:13:07 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

...and yet, strangely enough, the British still insist on calling meatballs "Faggots"...


27 posted on 04/24/2006 4:13:28 PM PDT by Skibane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
The English smoke fags

I'm not touching that one with a ten foot p....um, I'm not going there

28 posted on 04/24/2006 4:14:27 PM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
Homosexuality should be stricken as it is an offensive term to fanny bandits.
29 posted on 04/24/2006 4:14:40 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
The politically correct term is now "butt buddies".

AKA "rump rangers".

"Academics from the Queen Mary college compiled the report..."

It would be compiled from 'Queen Mary college' of course...

30 posted on 04/24/2006 4:15:19 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frankiep
Queer or fag is a more accurate description.

Fag means something else in GB. I believe the traditional term of art in England was "confirmed bachelor".

31 posted on 04/24/2006 4:15:28 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Poof OK?


32 posted on 04/24/2006 4:17:22 PM PDT by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Nancy Poofters?

Friends of Dorothy?

Queen Marys?


33 posted on 04/24/2006 4:18:27 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
How about:

The Fabulous!

34 posted on 04/24/2006 4:20:50 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

Bump!


35 posted on 04/24/2006 4:22:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lewite

"The Scriptures call queers "dogs"."

The dictionary calls queer Odd.

I guess you could call them odd dogs.


36 posted on 04/24/2006 4:23:36 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Juan Williams....Proof that Liberal stupidity is an STD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
Lord Falconer has ordered for the word to be removed on the grounds that it “may be considered offensive.

Maybe Lord Falconer can remove the homosexuals because the are offensive.

37 posted on 04/24/2006 4:24:41 PM PDT by Major_Risktaker ("If a fence doesn't work then why does Bush have one around the White House?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

"Sodomites" is even more accurate. If Sodomites are offended by that name, then maybe they will realize being a sodomite IS offensive.


38 posted on 04/24/2006 4:27:50 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

He who dares not offend cannot be honest. -- Thomas Paine


39 posted on 04/24/2006 4:31:48 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

OK, no more “homosexual.” How about queer perverts?


40 posted on 04/24/2006 4:32:00 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson