To: eyespysomething
2 posted on
04/24/2006 9:46:09 AM PDT by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: jveritas
To: jveritas; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
8 posted on
04/24/2006 9:52:42 AM PDT by
eyespysomething
(American liberals like everything about the struggle for freedom except the struggle.)
To: jveritas
Thanks for the lastest translation. I don't see why people are having a hard time with the tube dimensions. Simply think of a rocket 3" diameter some 40" long, with some fins on the back that pop out once the rocket leaves it's launching tube. It is no more. The issue since day one, is. Where these tubes to be used as rockets or where they to be used in a centrifuge cascade system.
It really is that simple. If destined for rocket manufacturing, there is no issue, other then the usual arguments revolving around oil for food verse oil for continued personal gain and arms build up.
It the tubes where destined for a uranium gas phase extraction process. Then obviously they where in violation of hiding a long term uranium enrichment process program, not permitted under the UN sanctions.
63 posted on
04/24/2006 11:12:26 AM PDT by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson