Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/24/2006 7:04:00 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat

We need to conduct an agency audit.


2 posted on 04/24/2006 7:06:25 AM PDT by John Geyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

the obvious question is if she is getting unreported income (cash) from leakage. that is a lot of after-tax money to be spending on politics.


4 posted on 04/24/2006 7:19:28 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
The CIA has lost its relevance and its objectivity. Time for it to be disbanded, and reformed, VERY much slimmed down.

The only ones that will whine about it will be the enemy, the ones with axes to grind other than doing their jobs, the ones they get PAID for. Protecting the people who hired them. Us.
5 posted on 04/24/2006 7:24:43 AM PDT by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Well this one really is Bush's fault. He didn't get Porter Goss in there soon enough. Instead he kept a clinton cronie as the top guy.

That was probably the biggest blunder of his first term. And now we are reaping what we have sown by not playing hardball out of the gate.

Bush needs to go on the offensive about this and play the victim...like Clinton did.


6 posted on 04/24/2006 7:25:12 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
But the broader context here is an intelligence community that was, quite brazenly, leaking in a manner designed to topple a sitting president. A big question here -- maybe not for purposes of guilt under the espionage act, but for the more important policy issue of a politicized CIA -- is whether she was part of a campaign that was grossly inappropriate for the intelligence community to engage in.

how about....SEDITION?

n: 'an illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority and tending to cause the disruption or overthrow of the government'

7 posted on 04/24/2006 7:25:18 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

We should abolish the CIA and immediately replace it with a new agency which can tehn be staffed from scratch.

The precedent is the Kennedy Administration abolishing the Bureau of the Budget (filled with Republican bureaucrats) and immediately replacing it (in the same legislation) with the Office of Management and Budget (which they stcoked with Democrat bureaucrats.)


11 posted on 04/24/2006 7:36:54 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

We should abolish the CIA and immediately replace it with a new agency which can tehn be staffed from scratch.

The precedent is the Kennedy Administration abolishing the Bureau of the Budget (filled with Republican bureaucrats) and immediately replacing it (in the same legislation) with the Office of Management and Budget (which they stcoked with Democrat bureaucrats.)


12 posted on 04/24/2006 7:36:55 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Did she know Kerry personally? Did she ever have occasion to brief the senator? It's a small world, especially at that level of government.
The money is more likely a bid by McCarthy to curry favor (and a high level job) with the Kerry administration.


14 posted on 04/24/2006 7:37:22 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Great post.

I thought the CIA should polygraph everyone a long time ago. Looks like they finally did. I don't think this is the last of it somehow, perhaps more heads will roll!o)

Grab the popcorn, should be a good show.


16 posted on 04/24/2006 7:40:39 AM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Will we now begin to see the fruits of Porter Goss's internal review or is this it? The dragging on of the Libby-Wilson-Plame affair makes me skeptical that we will ever get to the bottom of this cess pool.


22 posted on 04/24/2006 8:02:56 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

23 posted on 04/24/2006 8:03:29 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon
Unbelievable... woman caller (Becky from Hartford, west end) on Jim Vicevich's show now emphatically stating: "I think Mary McCarthy is a hero and should be given a medal for this. The Bush administration is downright scary..."

"We need people who don't give over their souls and consciences to their employer."

Vicevich slappin' her down with the FACTS... explaining why these overseas prisons needed to be kept secret, and how McCarthy's leaks are putting people's lives in danger. Becky continuing to let emotion rule over reason... she's spouting off (and is becoming louder and more "upset") about how dare the "the US can use any means necessary to extract information... that's creepy!" *barf*

26 posted on 04/24/2006 8:19:11 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Mary McCarthy (D, CIA)


30 posted on 04/24/2006 8:37:40 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Now we find that an intelligence officer who was leaking information very damaging to Bush was a Kerry backer to a degree that was extraordinary for a single person on a government salary, and, even more extraordinarily, gave $5K of her own money to Democrats in the key swing state (Ohio) that, in the end, did actually decide the election.

From where I sit, that’s pretty damn relevant.

Wow! Five grand! That's what I call dedicated to the socialist Democrat cause.
Very dedicated.

32 posted on 04/24/2006 8:43:23 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

That is a lot of money for a government employee. Giving the max amount!

Question. Does her IRS returns and income support her lifestyle. This is how Aldridge Ames was spotted (I believe).
Is this her legitimate money or money funneled to her to avoid "campaign laws"?
Was it possibly Kerry "back-door money" or Soros?


45 posted on 04/24/2006 9:53:47 AM PDT by Prost1 (Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
 
 
Where's the media?
 
[----crickets chirping----]
 
Hm - thought so, as usual FReepers have to do the heavy lifting.
 
 
 
 

62 posted on 04/24/2006 1:17:42 PM PDT by LastDayz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson