Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaineVoter2002
You're wrong; most of the Americans who voted and voted again, to get and then to keep Clinton in office, as president, knew little about him and what he did. He never even got very much of a majority.

The first time around, the Media, Perot, and a bunch of sit at homes, gave Clinton the win. Even with running a campaign, he heart was NOT in, President G.H.W, Bush WAS closing in, at the last minute. But it was not to be so.

But this election, the one in November of '06, is NOT a presidential one and the many people, on this thread, carping about this president Bush, are proving just how little they know or even care about REAL politics. For them, it's all emotion and venting their spleen.

And should the worst happen, and the GOP loses the House ( which I don't think is going to happen ), the Dems WILL impeach the president and anything and everything "bad" that happens, WILL be blamed on President Bush; though it WILL be that the damned Dems caused it. Most people don't know what we know, because they don't read FR. Even some here, don't read much of what's post here, nor do they take the time to understand it; sad to say.

100 posted on 04/23/2006 10:42:02 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
He never even got very much of a majority LOL! Now you're using DU tactics to argue your point. Using those tactics I guess Bush was impeachable after the 2000 election. lol Well, as a young adult I knew about Clinton's problem with his zipper. It was well known. I didnt even have cable at the time. I voted for Bush, but because of the issues. I agreed with Bush so I voted for him. But it was well known about Clinton. I really dont think we should go around impeaching our leaders based on whether or not they are faithful to their wives. Especially when it's a Hillary! Oh God! If they break the law, then they should face criminal charges after their term ends (unless that crime is stealing the election). If they steal an election then they have to be thrown out and hopefully executed for their crime. You see? Every little thing Bush is accused of by the left now (in their eyes) is an impeachable offense now. And now we are told to vote for a Spector over a Zell Miller because we dont want Bush to be impeached. We have to vote for an "R" over a "C" to keep out the "D" even though the "C" believes more in the constitution than maybe the "R" that's really a "D" in "R clothing". Good way to destroy not only the republican party but the nation. You want to save the GOP? Hold them responsible. Look for results. We see the democrat party has been losing power because they failed to do that with their leaders. We're better than that. That's what got us here in the first place. If we send a message to the GOP that we will vote for them no matter what...why would they improve? But it will be a false sense of security that will cost them elections. So, tough love is always better. Clinton had sex scandals during the time he was governor. It was known. I dont care if he won because of a 3rd party Perot. I dont care if he one by 1 vote. He won! That's irrevevent. He WON! That's all that matters. He won. The American people (stupidly) voted for him. The republicans impeached him. So now the standard is set. I dont support it because I dont support Bush being impeached...Bush was elected by the American people and just barely in 2000. But he won! Period. He should not be impeached. He did nothing to be impeached.
109 posted on 04/23/2006 11:12:28 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons

The Democrats will not impeach the President. Such an act would be politically suicidal. There are no Tom DeLays in the Democrat Party that are willing to risk electoral popularity to do what the base wants. The President is safe until he leaves office.


145 posted on 04/24/2006 8:04:45 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons
But this election, the one in November of '06, is NOT a presidential one and the many people, on this thread, carping about this president Bush, are proving just how little they know or even care about REAL politics. For them, it's all emotion and venting their spleen.

I hate to break this to you, but the one being clueless about politics lately is Bush. He has been told loudly and clearly by the base to drop his guest worker program. He refuses.

Meanwhile, the guys up for re-election this year, the GOP House members, are standing on the opposite side of the issue. So what does that tell you about the politics here?

146 posted on 04/24/2006 8:07:35 AM PDT by dirtboy (Illegal is to immigration is as methyl is to alcohol - both make a good thing toxic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson