Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary McCarthy and "Plastic Morality"
The Morning Paper-Special Edition | 04/23/06 | vanity

Posted on 04/23/2006 5:43:33 PM PDT by genefromjersey

Mary Mc Carthy and Plastic Morality

By now , everyone has heard the story : Mary Mc Carthy , a long-term veteran at the CIA , has been fired for “leaking” highly classified material to Dana Priestly, a star reporter for the Washington Post.

Ms Mc Carthy is not only unemployed ; she is in criminal jeopardy as well – and it is by no means a given that Dana Priestly and her employers are “off the hook” for prosecution under the espionage statutes.

At the moment, a Republican administration is in power , and many loyal Democrats are proclaiming (rather vigorously) Mc Carthy should be honored as a “whistleblower” , because some of the material she is said to have leaked made life more difficult for the Administration.

Some of her supporters suggest she had a “moral duty” to violate the stringent terms of her employment –and the espionage laws : a duty that transcends mere statutes and regulations. Some have even suggested that anyone who believes otherwise is on the road to becoming “ a good little Nazi”.

I have a suspicion many of those who presently extol the lady’s virtues might be cursing her - if Democrats occupied the White House ; but I could be wrong.

It’s hard to predict reactions in an age of “plastic morality”.

In many parts of our country , people who feel a high sense of moral obligation towards animals have bombed facilities that conduct animal research , vandalized the cars and homes of research employees,and conducted acts of criminal harassment.

On both coasts, other people who feel halting development is a highly moral act ,have burned down SUV dealerships, spiked trees in an effort to injure lumberjacks, burned down homes under construction, and have even fire-bombed a spring water bottling plant.

In the year 2001, a microbiologist (and friends) exercised their highly developed “morality” by sending Anthrax through the mail to “punish” America for its sins. (They had the good sense to suggest al-Qaeda might have done it – and loyal supporters willing to lay false trails for the FBI to follow ; but a day of reckoning will come…)

Politicians from all major parties have reached out eagerly to accept unclean contributions – forwarded by those who want to promote questionable commercial enterprises ,and welcomed the lobbyists who broker these deals with open arms. They justify betrayal of the public trust by claiming a high moral duty to secure and remain in elective office.

I could go on – and on – until my fingers are too weary to type,and your eyes are too weary to continue reading ; yet , after all was said and done, any one of us might nod approvingly – then go out to do something unspeakable – in the name of a “higher moral purpose”.

Such is the nature of Plastic Morality.


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anthrax; cia; corruption; domesticterrorism; leaks; marymccarthy; mccarthy; plasticmorality; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: genefromjersey

"Plastic morality," as illustrated, is a very good synonym for "liberalism."


21 posted on 04/23/2006 6:13:24 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wvobiwan

It now seems nearly certain that McCarthy was caught in a sting operation. Consider: She was in the top rank of the Inspector General's Office at the CIA, the office which would know who is being investigated within the agency. Yet, apparently she did not know. Thus, she may have been fed information that won Dana Priest a Pulitzer Prize but which just might have been based on phoney information. That would be the ultimate irony. As noted in previous postings the CIA IG had for years leaked like a sieve. However, the CIA cannot under law conduct a full field investigation in the USA. That is the FBI's job. I wonder if someone will ask that doofus who heads the FBI if he is up to the task?


22 posted on 04/23/2006 6:18:26 PM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
Now, now. You have this all wrong. In Idiot Liberal Land it's to be expected that the CIA and the news media work together for the benefit of the common good, you see. Even if it involves highly classified information. Even during a time of war.

That's the current liberal idiot meme being broadcast via the networks.

Liberals have found true patriotism. They've finally done it. And wouldn't you know? Liberal "patriotism" consists of aiding the enemy by broadcasting state secrets via liberal newspapers and television shows.

I know what Lincoln would have done to these traitorous swine.

23 posted on 04/23/2006 6:18:30 PM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Was at the gym on the treadmill this morning and the TV was on Russert. Dee Dee Myers was saying that, well if the person thinks the US citizens should know then its not actally leaking.

HELLO!!!!!!

These lunatics are so far off base they don't even realize how incredibly stupid that sounds.

I swear if the Dems ever regain power this country will self-destruct within four years.


24 posted on 04/23/2006 6:25:14 PM PDT by Bluestateredman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
These people were fed parts of the storyline from Season 2 of the FOX TV show "24".

I've been on top of that for over 6 months, and successfully predicted in November that the leftwingnuts would shortly come up with a story that the President was going to meet the Iranian nuclear challenge by dropping nukes on them.

There's probably some more stuff in Season 2 to use, but with the firing of Mary McCarthy, I think they've finally got the ball rolling over there and won't need to use that one anymore.

BTW, the most ingenous part of the scam was the FOX angle ~ after all, leftwingnuts don't watch FOX.

25 posted on 04/23/2006 6:26:02 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

MM is a Freedom Fighter - she's been fighting freedom for years.


26 posted on 04/23/2006 6:26:34 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

So, Juan, she had a "moral obligation" to take the bait, fall for a phoney, planted, story,(And go to jail) is that what you, et al are defending/slobbering about? You don't make a damn bit-o-sense, air head.


27 posted on 04/23/2006 6:31:27 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
Good post. But it's called, 'situational ethics'.

And the Pubbies and this Administration have not responded to them forcefully enough, if at all. See the Sandy Burglar case for reference, and watch a repeat here. Treason? Sedition? Who uses these words today except us right wing fanatics hereabout? And we're very much with the program as we can't even say 'niggardly' any more!

28 posted on 04/23/2006 6:32:08 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco
My, how quickly things change.

Not long ago, the moronic liberal press insisted that anyone leaking state secrets should be "frog marched," put to trial and imprisoned, if not hanged.

Now? Well. Now it's the case that such a person should be applauded for their "patriotism."

See? It's merely another example of how liberals love America. Liberal "patriotism" is what any rational being would call sedition.

29 posted on 04/23/2006 6:41:24 PM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

If someone died as a result, execute the bitch.


30 posted on 04/23/2006 6:44:56 PM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
I'm incresingly inclined to believe that you are right -that it was a sting. The European Union, having learned of the "secret prisons" from the WaPost, expressed loud outrage and set out to investigate. Last week they (more quietly) announced that they had found "no evidence" of such prisons.

It would be a rather delicious result if the duplicitous Mary McCarthy, the preening Dana Priest, the arrogant Washington Post, and the clueless Pulitzer Committee all fell for a CIA sting.

31 posted on 04/23/2006 6:45:04 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

"Hopefully there will be enough people...".

Key word: "Hopefully". Without a major wake-up call, I dunno.


32 posted on 04/23/2006 6:45:36 PM PDT by zebra 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
the CIA cannot under law conduct a full field investigation in the USA. That is the FBI's job. I wonder if someone will ask that doofus who heads the FBI if he is up to the task

From the March 6, 2006 Washington Post:

The Bush administration, seeking to limit leaks of classified information, has launched initiatives targeting journalists and their possible government sources. The efforts include several FBI probes, a polygraph investigation inside the CIA and a warning from the Justice Department that reporters could be prosecuted under espionage laws.

In recent weeks, dozens of employees at the CIA, the National Security Agency and other intelligence agencies have been interviewed by agents from the FBI's Washington field office, who are investigating possible leaks that led to reports about secret CIA prisons and the NSA's warrantless domestic surveillance program, according to law enforcement and intelligence officials familiar with the two cases.

<snip>

In a little-noticed case in California, FBI agents from Los Angeles have already contacted reporters at the Sacramento Bee about stories published in July that were based on sealed court documents related to a terrorism case in Lodi, according to the newspaper.

 

33 posted on 04/23/2006 6:46:01 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver

bttt


34 posted on 04/23/2006 6:48:06 PM PDT by dwighteise (People have more fun than anybody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

I am amazed McCarthy lasted as along as she did. She is what I consider a "soft traitor"... a bureacrat who at every turn undermines polices needed to protect America.


35 posted on 04/23/2006 6:57:51 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Your not alone.Juan is simply an airhead,and a lib to boot.I think Fox has him on to provide a counter point.Kind of like Colmes.I can't think of any other reason:)


36 posted on 04/23/2006 6:59:08 PM PDT by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
All this has come about because since the Vietnam War national security had (thanks to the KGB funded Communist subversion within) become a partisan issue and a personal decision. We don't trust the gummint, even if we work at the highest levels of the administration that we didn't vote for. Or especially if. And, as they teach in every J school in the country, the "public has a right to know", and the J school graduate class of untouchable priests (uh, uh, mind your 1st Amendment coppers!) is there to insure that we know that Tom Cruise and what's her name had a baby. (Congratulations to the father. What's his name?)

Every man a priest, said who, on that manifesto pasted on a church wall?

Every Joe Palooka a President, a Foreign Secretary.

I just think it's a bigger problem than a Daniel Ellsberg (who did start a trend, didn't he) or a Mary McCarthy.

37 posted on 04/23/2006 7:00:25 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wvobiwan

Did she break the law? If she did I want her strung up by her falopian tubes. On pay per view with the proceeds to go to the families of dead servicemen.


38 posted on 04/23/2006 7:04:37 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Somebody important make The Call.....pitchforks and lanterns.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

"Not even if the person thinks the policy to be wrong - just "doesn't like it"!!!!!"

I am coming to believe the dems are gathering forces to overthrow the current administration/government. They have a large body of supporters in both bodies of congress and the Judiciary is still loony left. Add to that the growing number of ex-military and the ingredients seems to be in place for a try at a coup!

Am I going goofy?


39 posted on 04/23/2006 7:16:54 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism is a mental illness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
She broke the law. If they can substantiate one death of an overt or covert agent that the leak caused they should hang the witch in public!!!!!
No one employee of the CIA should ever have the right to disclose classified information. She took an oath to maintain the secrets of our nation. She has committed treason. Let us not forget that she is a Klintonite traitor!!! Hang the witch and do it publicly!!!
40 posted on 04/23/2006 7:20:38 PM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson