Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's Energy Strategy Holds Lessons for Bush
LA Times ^ | 4.23.06 | Ronald Brownstein

Posted on 04/23/2006 10:13:34 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

President Bush could discover something important if he puts down his talking points long enough during his trip to California this weekend. Bush is using the visit to tout his energy policies; but the country would be better served if he took the time to learn from the state's energy strategy, which is emerging as an integrated alternative to the president's incomplete plan.

Piece by piece, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Democrats in the state Legislature are fashioning a comprehensive response to two of America's most pressing problems: the intertwined challenges of global warming and energy independence. Their approach — call it the California Idea — challenges both the means and assumptions of Bush's approach to energy.

In his first term, Bush focused almost entirely on promoting more domestic production of oil and gas. This year, he's also proposing more federal research money for solar and wind energy and for futuristic cars that could run on fuel produced from agricultural waste or hydrogen.

But Bush has unwaveringly opposed any mandates that would encourage conservation or accelerate the commercialization of those clean technologies. ... Bush's central argument is that mandates would hurt the economy.

California is pursuing the opposite strategy. It is formulating a series of mandates to speed the transformation toward an economy that uses less oil and emits less carbon dioxide. And it is imposing those mandates in the belief that they will bring jobs to the state by spurring technological breakthroughs — the historic engine of California's growth.

--snip--

... Schwarzenegger recently implemented a requirement that California utilities generate at least 20% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2010; he wants to raise the mandate to 33% by 2020.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bush; california; energy; lessons; schwarzenegger; strategy

1 posted on 04/23/2006 10:13:37 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Barf me out...California will have some rolling blackouts this summer, just like last summer and the summer before. That's an energy policy the federal government should follow?
2 posted on 04/23/2006 10:17:04 AM PDT by Drango (No electrons were harmed in this posting. Several however, were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

energy politics?
is that like "jumbo shrimp?" LOL

all anyone has to do is look south and see what Brazil has accomplished while the clowns in D.C. have been accepting those paid golf trips to Hawaii...


3 posted on 04/23/2006 10:17:28 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why not just put a price cap on fuel prices.
It seems to have worked oh so well for Hawaii.

/sc


4 posted on 04/23/2006 10:19:39 AM PDT by Chewbacca (Hell knows no fury than fiery habenaro Dorito's eaten before bedtime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
but the country would be better served if he took the time to learn
from the state's energy strategy


True.
California is probably listed in the dictionary as an example under
"negative role model".
5 posted on 04/23/2006 10:21:28 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It is formulating a series of mandates...

Ah, yes....the socialist's favorite pastime.

And it is imposing those mandates in the belief that they will bring jobs to the state by spurring technological breakthroughs — the historic engine of California's growth.

Translation: we need a president who will pass these mandates on other states to create an artificial market for our otherwise unmarketable green technology.

6 posted on 04/23/2006 10:23:06 AM PDT by Monti Cello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Remove the sanctuary status from the monterey bay and drill for OIL! That will fix things fast.


7 posted on 04/23/2006 10:23:59 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello

"Translation: we need a president who will pass these mandates on other states to create an artificial market for our otherwise unmarketable green technology."


I am in the presence of greatness. Excellent summation.


8 posted on 04/23/2006 10:25:47 AM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello

I wish he had told them "You dummies removed your offshore oil rigs and now you're whining... Are you stuck on stupid?!"


9 posted on 04/23/2006 10:26:23 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

you forgot the hurl alert


10 posted on 04/23/2006 10:27:21 AM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I don't like how California's government goes about things. I think you agree with that. On the other hand, Brazil has achieved some rather interesting levels of non-oil based energy production.

We've seen what happens to the price of gas when we cut consumption by 10 to 20%, yet we don't sign on to programs that will do just that or more. Instead we jump on each other for being anti-oil know-nothings or some such.

The left says no to nuclear. The right says no to ethanol. The left says no to oil, and the right laughs at wind and solar.

Anything that cuts on our foreign oil consumption that doesn't include government mandates, is something I'm going to be looking into. If others don't want to, I'll wonder why, but that's their choice too.


11 posted on 04/23/2006 10:38:16 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The left blocks everything except adopting the lifestyle of the Amish...Have you seen the tizzy Chapaquidick Fats has thrown to blocking the Martha's Vineyard windfarm?


12 posted on 04/23/2006 10:43:50 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Schwarzenegger recently implemented a requirement that California utilities generate at least 20% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2010;

How many CA utilities are still left? The environmental lobby has driven most the power producers out of CA and the legislatures won't allow any new power plants to be built. CA imports much of its energy from out of state or out of country.

For other states which produce much of their own power, this would be a non-starter.

13 posted on 04/23/2006 10:47:12 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

I have, and the government should tell them to stuff it. I've seen the windmills elsewhere and they're almost a work of art. I enjoy seeing them when I pass by where they are.


14 posted on 04/23/2006 10:47:56 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

HEY BUSH, write an Executive Order opening up certain oil and gas rich areas for drilling, begin building Nuclear reactors, by trimming and streamlining the EPA red tape. The ANWAR oil fields could be called a necessary thing, because of a "clear and present danger" to our oil supplies. Get a set Mr. President, your poll numbers are so low because you say that you don't stick your finger into the wind, but you act like a man waiting for a hurricane.


15 posted on 04/23/2006 10:55:41 AM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I agree, but some environmentalists are crying that they kill birds and alter windpatterns now. We'll be living like the Flintstones if we allow them to keep blocking energy initiatives.


16 posted on 04/23/2006 11:27:40 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Alter wind patterns? My how these folks magnify our powers.

I hear ya.


17 posted on 04/23/2006 11:29:39 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
he's also proposing more federal research money for solar and wind energy and for futuristic cars that could run on fuel produced from agricultural waste or hydrogen.

He'd better hurry; the private sector is miles ahead of him.
18 posted on 04/24/2006 11:45:46 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson