CIA VS. THE WHITE HOUSE: GOOD LEAKS OR BAD?
http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2006/04/22/cia-vs-the-white-house-good-leaks-or-bad/
The Clinton CIA comes Back To Bite Us
http://www.penraker.com/archives/004002.html
(Note that in both instances where reporters disclosed secret government programs, they won Pulitzers. Penraker)
Did Mary McCarthy Send Joe Wilson To Niger?
(ACE is the source on this)
Plame suggested his name; but a higher-up at the CIA actually sent him.
Who?
Now, McCarthy has links to general-turned-Rumsfeld-resignation-demander Anthony Zinni. And Sandy Berger. And, of course, Richard Clarke.
Would you believe she was also on the NSC during the same period, and with the same portfolio (Africa), as... JOE F'N' WILSON?
http://www.floppingaces.net/
It doesn't take a conspiracy theorist to see the vague outlines of a conspiracy here. We have a lot of like-minded people with the motive, means, and opportunity to subvert the democratically-elected foreign-policy official of this country when he dares to disrespect their superior enlightened liberal ideas.
FloppingAces says the name "Jay Rockefeller" seems to be popping up a lot, too. Wishful thinking, but hey, let's dare to dream.
Mary McCarthy was, at least at one time, the National Intelligence Offier for Warning. "Warning" is a branch of intelligence charged with, well, warning the President of potential threats-- collecting bits of data on a threat from all the different intelligence agencies and evaluating the level of the threat and presenting that information to the President.
Iraq was considered a threat in the early 2000's, of course.
It would seem that Mary McCarthy would have been one of the top CIA decision-makers as to what sort of person might be sent over to, say, Africa to investigate a particular threat-- the threat that Iraq was seeking uranium from Niger.
Now, that's how it seems to me. I don't know the NIO/W's exact responsibilities. But her testimony before the 9/11 commission describes the position as being about evaluating and analyzing threats specifically for consumption by the decision-making client (the President).
So: it seems likely she would be involved in investigating the threat of Iraq's nuclear program.
Did this lawbreaker and Kerry partisan ask Valerie Plame to ask Joe Wilson if he'd like to go on a secret public mission to Niger and come back with a report whitewashing any Iraq-Niger-uranium connection?
She would have known Joe Wilson. She knew his political leanings and that they agreed with her own. She would have been one of the people in the loop-- at the top of the loop, really -- for assessing the Iraq-Niger-uranium threat.
So-- was it Mary McCarthy who sent Wilson to Niger?
I'm sure the MSM will be right on top of that one.
More McCarthy: Berger Crony, Clinton Appointee, Witness At 9/11 Commission
And meanwhile, a double-secret probation agent for the real spy agency in America, the DNC.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2006/04/cia_leaker_mary.html
This woman was "Senior Director for Intelligence Programs on the National Security Council Staff. Prior to moving to the White House, Dr. McCarthy served on the National Intelligence Council as National Intelligence Officer for Warning, and Deputy NIO for Warning. " She served under both Clinton and Bush (the latter as a holdover).
She was not some minor flunky. She was a major officer at the CIA, holding a very high position in the National Intelligence Council, and all the while a strong political partisan.
She was one of the top apparatchik in the CIA's liberal-wing's war against the Bush Administration.
When Bush was warned away from divulging any information that would support the case for war in Iraq, this little partisan bitch was one of the people warning him he couldn't say anything in his own defense. And when he would give a CIA-approved narrow statement about Iraq, it was nasty little partisan hacks like her immediately leaking to the press that everything the President just said was a lie.
Except it wasn't a lie. It was the CIA consensus position on an issue. It's just that Kerry-supportin' Mary disagreed with it.
And why did the 9/11 Commission, despite powerful evidence, conclude with the fudged-up language that there was no "operational" partnership between Saddam and Al Qaeda? Because high CIA officials like McCarthy told the Democratic staffers she had their back and would leak like a sieve against any conclusion that allowed for some degree of cooperation between the two.
This is pretty big. The liberal cabal in the CIA just lost one of its top guns for subverting the government that nominally is in charge of it.
This, by the way, was a bit of a tip-off that she didn't really accept the whole "secret" part of the CIA's mission. From her 9/11 testimony:
The Congress, too, has a role in warning. Unlike other functions of democratic government, the conduct of intelligence is purposely-and with the consent of the public-carried out in secret, out of the view of public and without much public debate. Instead, Americans rely on their representatives in Congress to ensure that the intelligence function is performed, not only in a way that keeps us safe, but also in a way that is consistent with our democratic values.
Thus, the intelligence oversight committees have a heavy burden. Unlike other committees which regularly receive citizen input, and are assisted by the scrutiny of the public over "what the government is up to," the intelligence committees must depend on small staffs and input from the very agencies they are charged with overseeing.
And when Congress isn't holding Bush to account the way Mary McCarthy would like, she runs to the Washington Post to give the liberals in Congress the cover they need to go after him.
Dick Durbin wants to take on Bush over the prisons issues? Well, he can't, of course, at least not publicly. It's secret information, so Dick Durbin can't reveal it. He can argue about it behind closed doors, but what good does that do the liberals politically?
And so Mary McCarthy outs the information so that the Democrats can score their points without fear of being branded national-security leakers.
The game's up. You are now quite plainly out of your reckoning.
CIA Leaker Identified: Mary McCarthy
Yeah, she "admitted" leaking the information. After flunking a lie detector test in which she lied.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12423825/
And what's this?
McCarthy, Mary O
10/5/2004
$5,000.00
Bethesda, MD 20817
Center for Strategic & International [Contribution]
OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY
1,512 . Mccarthy, Mary O
3/14/2004
$2,000.00
Bethesda, MD 20817
U.S. Government/Analyst [Contribution]
JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT, INC.
I don't know for a fact that this is the same Mary McCarthy, but her location (just outside of DC) and her occupation (U.S. Government/Analyst-- totally CIA) do seem to match up.
Does it matter she's a big-money donor to Kerry and the Democrats?
Well, let's ask the question the opposite way. If she was caught leaking secret information that damaged a Clinton Administration, and was a big donor to Jeb Bush and the Ohio State Republicans, do you think the MSM would note that in passing?
The CIA is politicized, and some liberals have lost their goddamned minds. There is no limit any longer to what they are willing to do to subvert the current democratically elected government and claw their way back to power.
To find McCarthy in the list of political donors, go here, chose the 2002-2006 election cycles, enter "McCarthy," and then scan down for "Mary." You can't find her if you just type in "Mary McCarthy." Not sure why.
And I also can't post the link to the search results. You just have to go there and do the search yourself.
Here's one FEC disclosure report. The image for the Kerry donation isn't scanned yet, it seems.
Confirmed by Allah: A "Michael McCarthy," listed as her husband in the article, also lives in Bethesda with the same zip code, and he too donated to Kerry in 2004.
I looked for this at the site I was on for confirmation, but didn't find a Michael with a Bethesda address. I guess I just missed it, though, because a second check yields:
,623 . Mccarthy, Michael J
3/14/2004 $2,000.00
Bethesda, MD 20817
Michael Mccarthy Associates/Landsca [Contribution]
JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT INC [View Image]
1,624 . MCCARTHY, MICHAEL J
3/2/2004 $500.00
BETHESDA, MD 20817
MCCARTHY ASSOC [Contribution]
MIKULSKI FOR SENATE COMMITTEE
John "Jenjis Khan" Kerry. Babs Mikulski.
So, you know, I just can't wait until we're all assured that these are political centrists who "vote Democrat sometimes, Republican other times" and that Mary McCarthy illegally leaked classified information only out of a sense of "higher patriotism."
Be back with more later... on the milblogger conference, if anyone's interested:
http://militarywebcom.org/milblogs06
Sign up and click AED Washington for A/Video.
Spread the word. Lt. Smash, Greyhawk and a lot of the milbloggers are speaking as well as family of our fine military. The main point is getting the truth out.
Wow! Thank you for this incredible documentation about this Rat Traitor B$tch.
Ali never fails to amaze me with research:)
Ping for documetation(s)
Please read and maybe index the incredible info about this Rat Traitor from Ali Veritas.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1619501/posts?page=30#30
She is/was a very loyal Rat operative and funder of the rats. Only God knows how much damage she has done to America in the past and maybe in bs like the Wilson/Plame mess.
He will use it.
Ping to thread and especially post 30.
C.I.A. Fires Senior Officer Over Leaks
By DAVID JOHNSTON and SCOTT SHANE
Published: April 22, 2006
****************************AN EXCERPT********************************
WASHINGTON, April 21 — The Central Intelligence Agency has dismissed a senior career officer for disclosing classified information to reporters, including material for Pulitzer Prize-winning articles in The Washington Post about the agency's secret overseas prisons for terror suspects, intelligence officials said Friday.
***********************************Key Info **********************************
Intelligence officials speaking on the condition of anonymity said that the dismissal resulted from "a pattern of conduct" and not from a single leak, but that the case involved in part information about secret C.I.A. detention centers that was given to The Washington Post.
Good post but nothing new here. The NYT won a Pulitzer for publishing the Pentagon Papers in '72 -- another massive traitorous leak of classified information. That set the pattern.
Remember, the Pulitzer is an award given by ultra-liberal journalism elites (Columbia University/Columbia School of Journalism) to ultra-liberal working journalism elites. The two are virtually indistinguishable.
I was taken aback a few days ago when I saw an MSNBC news "anchor" interviewing someone critical of classified news leaks. The anchor asserted: "Isn't news what the government doesn't want us to know?" I guess that's what journalism's come to. After Vietnam and Watergate, 'journalism' no longer distinguishes between 'news' and the national interest. Most of today's journalists are functional traitors.
Fantastic work! Why aren't you in the CIA? Your research and analysis are first rate. Thank you, thank you.
It is information like this that just makes me unbelievably irritated:
When Bush was warned away from divulging any information that would support the case for war in Iraq, this little partisan bitch was one of the people warning him he couldn't say anything in his own defense. And when he would give a CIA-approved narrow statement about Iraq, it was nasty little partisan hacks like her immediately leaking to the press that everything the President just said was a lie.
Especially when I have liberal friends that say "the government aka Bush Administration" has been going around discrediting these people to support their war and "silence any and all critics." The truth appears to be the other way around, but it is exceptionally difficult to argue that point. They have it completely backwards and have no real grasp of just how dangerous this situation is.
Check out this NewsMeat search.
Total: $7,700 to dems since late 2002.