| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/22/2006 12:27:22 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
per request, post to this link http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1619050/posts |
Posted on 04/22/2006 8:32:31 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
The officer flunked a polygraph exam before being fired on Thursday and is now under investigation by the Justice Department, NBC has learned.
Intelligence sources tell NBC News the accused officer, Mary McCarthy, worked in the CIA's inspector general's office and had worked for the National Security Council under the Clinton and and George W. Bush administrations.
The leak pertained to stories on the CIA’s rumored secret prisons in Eastern Europe, sources told NBC. The information was allegedly provided to Dana Priest of the Washington Post, who wrote about CIA prisons in November and was awarded a Pulitzer Prize on Monday for her reporting.
Sources said the CIA believes McCarthy had more than a dozen unauthorized contacts with Priest. Information about subjects other than the prisons may have been leaked as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Forget about it........... this Justice Department won't even read Jayna Davis' material on OKC.
They're all in it together.......... unfortunately............it's all one "select comfort" bed of thieves.
How about as a key word:
CIARATFIRED, CIAFIREDMCCARTHY
CIATRAITORFIRED
Fits and works also.
ping for more
Lets hope that this is true.
Those two bozos would destroy this country to put rats back into power.
How about Mary Macabre.
CIALEAKEREXPOSED, CIALEAKERFIRED
Both of these fit in and work.
BINGO... There are a few examples of proper outrage and mocking.. but they are few.. Ann Coulter even Newt Gingrich come mind.. Republicans should start by a proper scourging of republican Moonbats... THEN they can have the gravitas to attack the Traitorcrats..
Then acidic wind could start the Foggy Bottom cleanup.. Could be done with humor.. The Sandy Burgular affair is an example.. You can't makeup humor that good.. Acidic humor must become a republican gambit.. The chocolate covered underground pseudo city (New Orleans) is another example.. Nagin and Blanko are prime straight people..
Thanks for the pings.
Why is she still breathing? Where is the "Consequence Police"?
You raise a good question.
The fact that the traitor is Rat B$tch opens up a lot of questions about her rat yellow sheet journalist buddies.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1619579/posts
Rockefeller, Durbin To Take Polygraphs! [The REAL "Culture of Corruption"...!]
Strata-Sphere.com ^ | 4/22/2006 | A.J. Strata
Posted on 04/22/2006 10:48:05 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Mac Ranger has been listening in on the internal investigation regarding the leaks of the criticial Terrorist Surveillance Program run by the NSA and the CIA programs to transfer suspected terrorists into US custody. The focus is coming down on two heavy weight Democrat Senators: Rockefeller and Durbin.
This source expands on the Washington Post story and confirms some of Mac Rangers information that these two US Senators (and their staff) may be facing polygraph tests.
During the Bush Administration, a nexus of politicians, government workers and members of the news media have worked overtime in leaking classified information. From the secret terrorist prisons to the National Security Agency’s super-secret surveillance program, intelligence officials and the Bush Administration have had to watch their counterterrorism efforts neutralized for political reasons.
Special agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation recently interviewed dozens of employees at the CIA, the NSA and other intelligence agencies as part of an intense and wide-reaching investigation. Many employees who possess security clearances at the CIA, FBI, the Justice Department and other agencies received letters from the Justice Department forbidding them from discussing even unclassified intelligence programs.
But people such as former deputy-undersecretary of Defense Jed Babbin don’t think the Justice Department investigators and prosecutors have the guts to indict a US senator. Babbin said it would cause a battle royal on the Hill, if not a constitutional crisis.
He did say however, that any senator or Congressional staffer that holds a security clearance can be asked at any time to take a polygraph. The individual can of course refuse to take the test, but failure to do so is reason to remove that person’s security clearance. Babbin further said that Senators Rockefeller, Durbin, and Wyden, and some on their staffs will soon be requested to take polygraphs.
Senators and their staff may refuse, but they will also lose their clearances and are still exposed to criminal prosecution. And if the word leaks out these people did refuse it is over for the Democrats. The Democrat staffers will not hold a united front here - they aren’t paid enough, are treated like garbage and are not idealogues. The squeeling must be intense right now as the rats jump ship. And I think this will expose a rift in the Democrats between the honest statesman and the do-anything-to-win pols.
But it’s not only the Bush Administration that is frustrated with all the leaks and news stories. Recently Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-CA) said straight out that the New York Times, which ran a frontpage story on the top secret NSA spy program, should be prosecuted for their actions.
Some news stories have pointed fingers at Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), co-chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, as a possible leaker. Others cited sources that pointed to senate staffers. Still others believe that liberal politicians in both parties are secretly leaking information to the news media for political reasons.
If I was a Democrat I would not want to be on the wrong side of Jane Harmon. She exemplifies credibility and seriousness about national security. I end in noting the credentials of this author:
Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police.
We are still adding to that thread. I'll link this one.
Campaign contributions
March 14, 2004 McCarthy gave $2000 to the campaign of John F. Kerry. Source: Political Money Line and NY Times[2].
October 15, 2004 McCarthy gave $5000 to the Ohio Democratic Party. Source: Political Money Line
October 29, 2004 McCarthy gave $500 to "DNC services Corp" [3]
November 1, 2002 McCarthy gave $200 to Steve Porter Andreasen (D-MN). [4]
AMEN....
The Forum has divided aims as I see it.
Hardcore researchers like to have everything on a single thread....
Driveby News seekers like short , to the point headlines and a quick analysis....
Bumplists and Keywords were intended to kind of keep things together, but seem to have lost usage.
Backhoe contributes also...in helping organizxe and keep track..... Backhoe you got a list going yet on this ...ERUPTION?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.