Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Back to the Border - Security first.
National Review Online ^ | 4/22/06 | Senator Bill Frist

Posted on 04/22/2006 7:07:29 AM PDT by crimsonright

April 22, 2006, 9:00 a.m. Back to the Border Security first.

By Senator Bill Frist

Democrat obstruction torpedoed comprehensive immigration reform in the Senate earlier this month. At the same time, concerns about getting our border under control came into clear relief with news this week of the Department of Homeland Security's effort to crack down on egregious violations of immigration law. It is time to both secure our borders and reform our immigration system. So next week, the Senate will act to increase funding for border security-first. And then, before the end of May, the Senate must again take up-and finish-comprehensive immigration system reform.

When it takes up the immigration reform, the Senate must address border security, worksite enforcement, and the status of the 12 million people who are currently here illegally. But to build confidence among Americans and Congress that the government takes border security seriously, we have to act to help get the border under control right now.

By Memorial Day, the president plans to sign an emergency-spending measure, which we will use to fund this next step in border security. Democrat obstructionism on the larger immigration bill, I hope, will end before that. So far it has not: Minority Leader Harry Reid has acted to block the Senate from even voting on proposals like a ban on convicted felons taking part in temporary-worker programs.

Under any circumstances, security has to come first. We don't know how many criminals, gang members, and terrorists might have snuck across in the 20 years since Congress last made serious reforms to our immigration system. We need to know who is in our country, and why. A comprehensive immigration bill will allow all levels of law enforcement to focus on those who threaten to do us harm.

Last year, Judd Gregg and others lead an effort to hire 1,500 new border patrol agents and build 1,800 new detention beds. The proposal we will consider next week provides nearly $2 billion to build a border fence in high-traffic areas, add new border-patrol aircraft to help police lower traffic areas, and support training for additional Customs and Border Protection Agents.

The Senate is also near consensus on putting nearly 15,000 new border-patrol agents in the field over the next six years. More security spending now is part of the plan. To pay for it, we will cut spending in other areas. The proposal we will consider next week helps Customs and Border Protection enforce the laws we already have. It does not, however, include any of the still necessary reforms to our immigration laws contained in the broader comprehensive package we will act on in May.

For those with deep concerns about the bigger bill, the Senate will be putting the horse before the cart. Security first. Right now. But just as the horse goes with the cart, our action now must occur in concert with finishing action on the bigger immigration bill in May. That legislation contains the full multiyear plan to beef up border-security operations dramatically, including a virtual fence that uses a mix of physical and electronic means to secure every inch of our 1,951-mile border with Mexico.

I believe that a consensus has developed in the Senate that fixing border security is as important as creating an immigrant worker program. In early April, in fact, the Senate came very close to a breakthrough: Senators Chuck Hagel and Mel Martinez, along with many others, developed a fair, workable plan that would help deal with the 12 million people who are already in the United States.

Under their proposal, nobody who has violated immigration laws will get a free pass. Nearly everyone who has lived here illegally less than two years will have to return to their country of origin and apply through ordinary channels if they ever hope to live here legally. People who have lived here longer will have to pass rigorous background checks, learn English, and pay fines if they ever hope to achieve legal status.

Action now on border-security spending ought to affirm our country's commitment to getting the border under control. Passing a comprehensive immigration bill will guarantee a sustained plan to improve border security and deal with comprehensive reform. It will honor our heritage as a nation of immigrants and our respect for the rule of law. Finally, and most importantly, it will make America safer and more secure.

— Bill Frist is the U.S. Senate Majority Leader.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; amnesty; borderlist; bordersecurity; frist; fristisacoward; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; immigrationreform; rinosmustgo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: webstersII
Kris Kobach, former head of immigration in the Justice Department, stated, "Amnesty is any moving from an illegal to a legal status.
21 posted on 04/22/2006 7:27:07 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
You'd rather not get $2 billion more for border security? Politics is the art of compromise - I would have thought old-time FReepers knew that.

What a load!!! WE have an immigration policy. It needs to be enforced. It's people like you that believe "compromise" is taking a position and having convictions that are ruining this country.

I bet you believe in "diversity", too, don't you?

22 posted on 04/22/2006 7:27:38 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
IMO, if the border enforcement doen't include this,


A sharpshooters nest at the Berlin wall.

Some of the posters on FR will still call Frist all types of names and stay silent about the democrats.

BTW, anybody hear about the news of the 2 Atlanta area muslims who were caught in Canada plotting terrorist attacks.

23 posted on 04/22/2006 7:28:03 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: raybbr

You call it "hypocrisy" and I call it "compromise".


25 posted on 04/22/2006 7:29:47 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Did any of you hear about the 1432 illegal aliens from terrorist countries caught crossing the Mexican border in a recent 16 month period?
26 posted on 04/22/2006 7:30:10 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: crimsonright

Translation: We Republicans welcome our return to minority status in the Senate, and possibly even in the House.


27 posted on 04/22/2006 7:31:33 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: webstersII

There will never be forced detention and repatriation camps in this country......ever. Get over it.

"Why do you guys always say this type of stuff?"


Many Freepers suffer from the Michael Savage disease and believe we should just round up every illegal and send them back to Mexico. Try to work out the mechanics of sending every illegal alien home and tell me how it can be done without rounding-up large groups, interning them, and after working out a deal with Mexico if possible, repatriating them. How will it be done without forced detention and repatriation camps?


29 posted on 04/22/2006 7:32:46 AM PDT by PresidentFelon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

I'm not an illegal immigrant.


30 posted on 04/22/2006 7:32:51 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
You call it "hypocrisy" and I call it "compromise".

Compromise is the lazy man's way of dealing with controversy. It is a lack of spine and conviction.

31 posted on 04/22/2006 7:33:06 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
Sending all illegals back to Mexico will never happen.

Cut off the subsidized housing, welfare and other public benefits, crack down on their employers.

The majority of them can then send themselves home.

32 posted on 04/22/2006 7:33:20 AM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

Please read post #28.


33 posted on 04/22/2006 7:33:43 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: GarySpFc

It's unthinkable that our government will bow down to illegal immigrants. We need a conservative third party badly.























35 posted on 04/22/2006 7:34:52 AM PDT by exbrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Did any of you hear about the 1432 illegal aliens from terrorist countries caught crossing the Mexican border in a recent 16 month period?

Hush. You'll get reported to the mods.

36 posted on 04/22/2006 7:35:02 AM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Politics is the art of compromise - I agree there are some things where compromise is not option - good luck in your efforts if you think immigtation is one of those things.


37 posted on 04/22/2006 7:35:27 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
From your homepage:

We are fortunate to live in the greatest nation on Earth and it is the duty of every American to make sure the dream of our Founding Fathers lives on. The Constitution is the foundation of our greatness and must be protected at any cost for the sake of our progeny. This Hoosier accepts those responsibilities.

Have you read that recently?

38 posted on 04/22/2006 7:35:31 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Politics is the art of compromise ...

We are not talking about art. We are talking about the invasion of our country.

39 posted on 04/22/2006 7:36:41 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

What this is about is the U.S. Chamber and the mega public companies that make up that organization flexing their muscle again. This is the same group of companies that continue to propagandize and lobby for the Chinese Communist Party in this country so that they can hopefully cash in on the mythical "China market."

Today's MNCs have no borders, and no loyalties except to their Directors and major shareholders. They would sell this country and the working citizens of it down the river without reflection.

Unfortunately, 80 percent of the GOP acts like the party of Rockefeller when big business comes calling - forgettiing that it is groups of working, right thinking Americans who came from families of working class Democrats that make up the core of their electoral support.


40 posted on 04/22/2006 7:37:17 AM PDT by crimsonright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson