[tallhappy]

The modern science of genetics is based, in part, of the demonstrable facts of evolutionary theory.

This is not true in any way shape or form and represents a severe misunderstanding of genetics and biological science.

The opposite is accurate. Genetics and findings that have come from basic genetics can and are interpreted within a theoretical evolutionary framework.

Your comment is interesting in that it is wrong and to to thextent that it is accurate or coherent it is 180 degress from the actual situation. It's interesting to see it turned around in such a manner and I'm wondering where you read the claim.

[Stultis]

The modern science of genetics is based, in part, of the demonstrable facts of evolutionary theory.

This is not true in any way shape or form and represents a severe misunderstanding of genetics and biological science.

Not in any way shape or form? Isn't this blanket denial as absurdly extreme as you're portraying evolutionists as being? For instance the mathematical formalisms, arguably the entire field, of "population genetics," which is certainly part of "the modern science of genetics," were explicitly developed, but leading evolutionary biologists, to address issues arising from evolutionary theory.

[muir_redwoods]

"Your comment is interesting in that it is wrong and to to thextent that it is accurate or coherent it is 180 degress from the actual situation. It's interesting to see it turned around in such a manner and I'm wondering where you read the claim."

You are 100% wrong.

Evolution is a fact. Live with it.