But I must admit the liberal republicans are an abomination. The bottom line is that unless we get a bigger majority, tossing out all the libs from lib states would probably mean losing control of the Senate.
If we in the south can finish off the rest of the RATs in the Senate like Mary Landreu, Blanche Lincoln and the few others, than the North East can have all the RAT Senators they want.
What would be the difference?
The Dems give amnesty to 15 million, instead of "only" 12 million, Mexican nationals?
We have enough liberals in the Senate, (nominal) Republicans and Dems.
They said the same thing about Reagan. He can't win because he's "too conservative." The Rino's always load their gun with that one.
Did you know Reagan carried Massachusetts and New York twice? (Though Rhode Island voted for him just once.)
In California, back in 1992, a Democrat tidal wave swept the state. The only candidate to almost win was Bruce Hershensohn, a genuine conservative who got smeared at the last minute by Boxer and gang and barely lost. In the other senate race, Rino John Seymour, a pseudo Democrat, got beat bad. He stood for nothing.
Conservatives with a temperament and good meassage can win almost anywhere.
Think of it as a teaching aid....even if you are a RINO, act like a Republican some times.