Skip to comments.
Bill seeks to require guns to tag ammunition
Contra Costa Times ^
| 4/21/6
| Rebecca Rosen Lum
Posted on 04/21/2006 7:41:44 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last

Bob Pepping/Times
Terence Wong, Contra Costa County deputy sheriff criminalist, says shell casings from guns with microscopic stamping equipment care a unique "signature" from the firing pin used to fire them. A state bill would require all semi-automatic handguns to be so equipped.
1
posted on
04/21/2006 7:41:46 AM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Any knowledgeable hitman uses a revolver anyway.
Generally a .22, in fact.
2
posted on
04/21/2006 7:43:12 AM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: SmithL
Any knowledgeable hitman uses a revolver anyway.
Generally a .22, in fact.
3
posted on
04/21/2006 7:43:14 AM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: SmithL
4
posted on
04/21/2006 7:44:26 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: SmithL
This is so stupid. It would be so easy to erase the die on the end of the firing pin.
5
posted on
04/21/2006 7:44:27 AM PDT
by
eastforker
(Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
To: SmithL
"The pin is nearly as hard as a diamond"
This kind of stuff is just laughable.
6
posted on
04/21/2006 7:46:47 AM PDT
by
VRing
(Nine out the ten voices in my head told me to stay home and clean my rifle today.)
To: eastforker
How soon will it be that you can buy a firing pin on eBay that stamps "This gun ow3ed by Diane Feinstein" on every shell?
7
posted on
04/21/2006 7:46:58 AM PDT
by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: SmithL
Amusing.

8
posted on
04/21/2006 7:47:08 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
To: SmithL
And when they can't do it, (Technically), the semi-auto pistol becomes an illegal gun - how convenient.
9
posted on
04/21/2006 7:47:24 AM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(This line intentionally left blank)
To: coloradan
I also like the idea of sprinkling spent casing from a firing range.
10
posted on
04/21/2006 7:48:05 AM PDT
by
eastforker
(Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
To: SmithL
What are they thinking with? There are aftermarket replacement firing pins. And nothing's easier than removing a firearm firing pin and polishing it.
11
posted on
04/21/2006 7:48:21 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: SmithL
"You can put an identifying number on every container of yogurt you sell, but not on a gun?" That's because people, generally speaking, don't use the same yogurt container over and over again. They do, however, reload firearms after firing a few rounds through them. (They're not like throw-away cameras where you toss them when all of the pictures have been taken.) If people used yogurt containers like they do firearms, then the serial numbers would wear off in short order.
12
posted on
04/21/2006 7:48:36 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Messing up perfectly good threads since 1998.)
To: SmithL
I smell a mass exodus of gun manufacturers selling in The People's Republik of Kalifornia. This law is absolutely ridiculous, and it's another attempt to subvert the Constitution of the United States. Go to Hell you Kalifornia sycophants! Give us our freedom, lest we take away yours at the ballot box!
13
posted on
04/21/2006 7:48:37 AM PDT
by
rarestia
("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
To: SmithL
A "bullet shell?" Jeeeez...
Multimillion-dollar initiative defeated by less than a penny's worth of sandpaper.
14
posted on
04/21/2006 7:49:18 AM PDT
by
Tarantulas
( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
To: SmithL
It's SOP among criminals to file the serial number off any gun they intend to use in a crime.
It will take any criminal thirty secons with a file to disable this thing.
The only people affected will be law-abiding gunowners.
15
posted on
04/21/2006 7:49:20 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: SmithL
I'm sure that they will not have much success and just insist on installing a LoJack on each shell.
16
posted on
04/21/2006 7:49:26 AM PDT
by
pikachu
(For every action there is an equal and opposite government program)
To: WorkerbeeCitizen
No "technically" about it. Another way to harass law-abiding gun owners.
Next thing you know, they'll require licensing and registration for these:

Woodworkers, beware!
17
posted on
04/21/2006 7:50:24 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: SmithL
"It has the potential to solve some significant crimes in some pretty large numbers," Koretz said in a telephone interview. Oh, please! This is nothing but an attempt at back door gun banning. As I see it, the motive is to make gun makers stop doing business in California.
Then, after the guns are banned, they call all sit together around the campfire singing 'kumbaya' and live in perfect peace with the earth.
18
posted on
04/21/2006 7:51:05 AM PDT
by
CrawDaddyCA
(I ain't learning no friggin' Spanish!! This is America, you learn English!!)
To: SmithL
The technology expands on the incidental markings that already appear on cartridge casings, Lizotte said. "Instead of relying on randomly created marks, we're placing an identifier specific to that firearm."
Um... why? Prosecutors have long asserted that those "randomly created marks" are sufficiently distinct and identifiable to send people to jail, so what's the point of this new technology?
Could it be that the only real purpose is to make all existing guns illegal?
To: mvpel
You can have my Swiss files when you pry them from my cold, dead fingers!
20
posted on
04/21/2006 7:52:27 AM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
("Those who "abjure" violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson