Posted on 04/19/2006 4:09:29 PM PDT by scripter
While two parents in Lexington, Mass., are upset about the fact their second-grade son was read a fantasy book in school about two princes getting married, what makes them even more angry is the fact the boy's teacher said because same-sex marriage is legal in their state there is no way a mother or father can opt out a child from such experiences.
"We are outraged," parents Rob and Robin Wirthlin told the local Article 8 Alliance. "This is a highly charged social issue. Why are they introducing it in the second grade? And we cannot present our family's point of view to our children if they don't tell us what they're saying to them."
According to a statement from the traditional-values organization, March 24 the Wirthlins' second-grade son came home from Estabrook Elementary School and repeated to his mother the story read to him earlier that day about men getting married to each other. His teacher had read the book "King and King" to the class, in which a prince doesn't want to marry any princesses, but instead falls in love with a princess' brother and marries him in a big palace wedding.
The Wirthlins say they immediately contacted the teacher, Heather Kramer, who acknowledged she had read the book to the class and admitted that it was not part of the curriculum.
It was explained to the couple that since same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, discussion of the matter is fair game -- parents do not have to be informed before or after the issue is presented. Kramer reportedly told the Wirthlins that the theme of the day was "weddings" and the teacher wanted to present all points of view on the subject.
Article 8 Alliance reports other parents in the school claim Kramer attended a presentation last year by the Gay Lesbian & Straight Education Network on promoting homosexuality in the classroom.
David Parker, parent of kindergartner, stands before Judge Robert McKenna in Concord District Court April 28 after spending the night in jail (Photo: Article 8 Alliance) |
States the organization: "Lexington school officials continue to claim that homosexuality and homosexual relationships do not does not constitute human sexual relationships and thus do not trigger the Massachusetts parental notification law Ch. 73 Sec. 32a."
After the Wirthlins met with Kramer and Principal Joni Jay to discuss their concerns, Jay sent an e-mail to the couple inviting them to contact Dr. Paul Ash, superintendent of the school district, "since your concerns involve district-wide issues."
As WorldNetDaily reported, a North Carolina couple was equally outraged two years ago when "King and King" was read to their daughter's first-grade class.
Estabrook School was also in the news last year when father David Parker faced prosecution for trespassing and spent a night in jail after confronting school officials about homosexuality being discussed in his son's class.
"what makes them even more angry is the fact the boy's teacher said because same-sex marriage is legal in their state there is no way a mother or father can opt out a child from such experiences."
And that is when I would pull my children from the public school and homeschool instead. Parents do have a way to opt out if they can figure out a way to make it happen!
There's no sense in that claim.
By having "Dinner" together?
Are you suggesting homophagia (Daumerism).
That should have been "consum[m]ate."
Everything that is "legal" is not "moral" or "right".
shop for curtains???
Yes indeedy folks, welcome to MA where ANYTHING goes, ANYTHING. I'm waiting for the day someone in this State marries their dog/cat/bird, it's not that far away and keep in mind it'll be done "for the children"
"Lexington school officials continue to claim that homosexuality and homosexual relationships do not does not constitute human sexual relationships and thus do not trigger the Massachusetts parental notification law Ch. 73 Sec. 32a."
Of course it is not about SEX -it is about "gayness"...
Of course it is not about SEX -it is about "lesbianism"...
/end sarcasm
ROTFLMAO
Thanks for the ping!
So........, on the one hand, "Lexington school officials continue to claim that homosexuality and homosexual relationships do not does not constitute human sexual relationships and thus do not trigger the Massachusetts parental notification law Ch. 73 Sec. 32a."
And on the other hand, the teacher indicated that same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, so there's no reason not to discuss the subject.
The logic involved here defies reason.
ago=age. Man, am I pi$$ed!
spoken like a true meathead -like Kennedy and the
rest of the intelligentsia in Massachusetts..also
Kerry and Barney..what a bunch of bananas... Jake
But gay marriage is legal in Massachusetts. </sarcasm>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.