Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Looking for clinton 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' audio-and what ARE those bill, hillary photos?
Mark Steyn, The New York Sun, WCBS NEWSRADIO 880 | 4.19.06 | Mia T

Posted on 04/19/2006 10:18:53 AM PDT by Mia T

Looking for the bill clinton 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' audio or video
(AND WHAT ARE THOSE NEWS SERVICE PHOTOS OF BILL + HILLARY ABOUT, ANYWAY?)


It 10 was uttered on April 12, 2006.
The impeached ex-president was
accepting an award named after his mentor, the late Sen. William Fulbright of Arkansas.



BTW, this AP photo of him rivals the Reuters fire-and-brimstone photo of her....

Well, almost. ;)

Is the news-service sector trying to tell us something?


IS REUTERS SENDING A MESSAGE ABOUT A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY?




Carpe Mañana: The clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')


FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!

 

by Mia T, 04.18.06

 


 





"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war,'' [clinton] said.

He also reflected on his own decisions when, as commander in chief, he was urged to launch a military strike.6

"I always thought of Senator Fulbright and the terrible quagmire in Vietnam and how many times we sent more soldiers and found ourselves in a hole and kept digging because we didn't want to look like we were weak,'' he said.

"So anytime somebody said in my presidency, 'If you don't do this people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'"

"If we can kill 'em tomorrow, then we're not weak,1 and we might be wise enough to try to find an alternative way,'' he said.

bill clinton

Bill Clinton, the Sultan of Swing, gave an interesting speech last week, apropos foreign policy: "Anytime somebody said in my presidency, 'If you don't do this people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' If we can kill 'em tomorrow, then we're not weak, and we might be wise enough to try to find an alternative way."

The trouble was tomorrow never came - from the first World Trade Center attack to Khobar Towers to the African embassy bombings to the USS Cole. Manana is not a policy. The Iranians are merely the latest to understand that.

Reason Enough To Act
BY MARK STEYN
The New York Sun
April 17, 2006






or the clintons
to succeed, Bush must fail, which means America must lose THE WAR.

Make no mistake: The undermining of Bush and America is the number one clinton imperative.2

DEFINING DEVIANCY DOWN

The clintons typically prop themselves up by revising others down.3 Direct, upward revision of their own legacy is virtually impossible to pull off,4 given their wide-reaching unsavory renown.F

But the clintons' inflated sense of self causes them from time to time to dispense with rational thought and attempt to do just this; and so we get the clinton mañanas.

PURPOSEFUL FAILURE

First clinton claimed he got impeached on purpose. To save the Constitution, he said. Now he claims he failed to confront terrorism on purpose. Because we can kill 'em tomorrow, he says.

NOTE: The clintons did fail to confront terrorism on purpose, but not for the reason stated.5 (Indeed, contrary to clinton's absurd argument, the clintons' feckless inaction (and feckless action, for that matter,) were precisely the sign of weakness that emboldened bin Laden and al Qaeda.1 Bin Laden told us so himself.


Lopez: In sum, how many times did Bill Clinton lose bin Laden?

Miniter: Here's a rundown. The Clinton administration:

1. Did not follow-up on the attempted bombing of Aden marines in Yemen.

2. Shut the CIA out of the 1993 WTC bombing investigation, hamstringing their effort to capture bin Laden.

3. Had Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a key bin Laden lieutenant, slip through their fingers in Qatar.

4. Did not militarily react to the al Qaeda bombing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

5. Did not accept the Sudanese offer to turn bin Laden.

6. Did not follow-up on another offer from Sudan through a private back channel.

7. Objected to Northern Alliance efforts to assassinate bin Laden in Afghanistan.

8. Decided against using special forces to take down bin Laden in Afghanistan.

9. Did not take an opportunity to take into custody two al Qaeda operatives involved in the East African embassy bombings. In another little scoop, I am able to show that Sudan arrested these two terrorists and offered them to the FBI. The Clinton administration declined to pick them up and they were later allowed to return to Pakistan.

10. Ordered an ineffectual, token missile strike against a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory.

11. Clumsily tipped off Pakistani officials sympathetic to bin Laden before a planned missile strike against bin Laden on August 20, 1998. Bin Laden left the camp with only minutes to spare.

12-14. Three times, Clinton hesitated or deferred in ordering missile strikes against bin Laden in 1999 and 2000.

15. When they finally launched and armed the Predator spy drone plane, which captured amazing live video images of bin Laden, the Clinton administration no longer had military assets in place to strike the archterrorist.

16. Did not order a retaliatory strike on bin Laden for the murderous attack on the USS Cole.


READ MORE

 




TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 911; billclinton; bush; clinton; clintonfailure; corruption; elections; fulbright; gwot; hillary; hillary08; iran; iraq; manana; photojournalism; terror; terrorism; terrorists; theterrorismstupid; tomorrow; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Mia T
I asked the same question in another thread. It's incomprehensible to me that no one has picked up the ball on this one.

What better way to highlight the 'total incompetence' in the Clinton administration while citing the true LEGACY of the Clinton years--that being the national security mess that Clinton left President Bush to clean up?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1602934/posts

41 posted on 04/21/2006 6:40:29 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
Clinton thread
42 posted on 04/21/2006 6:47:08 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: stocktrader

It's hard to believe Hume's failure to report this story is willful.

This one act by the clintons encapsulates why they must never again be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office.

And there is an audio of clinton's admission. And a video. And an audio of a denial by clinton that he said what he said.

And groundbreaking reporting by Richard Miniter as to clinton's motivation, the source being none other than Madeleine Albright.

In other words, there exist the makings of a compelling, critically important story.


43 posted on 04/21/2006 6:56:58 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I can't believe that Brit Hume would be 'muzzled' on an important documentary of major international interest like this!

Again, it's just amazing that no one has decided to research the issue, present it in a THOROUGH manner, and highlight the REAL Clinton legacy!

44 posted on 04/21/2006 7:15:01 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
clinton is a self-serving, abject coward.

Now that things are tough, the coward risks nothing to whip out his old standby: He now claims he failed to go after the terrorists on purpose. (He also got impeached 'on purpose. To save the Constitution.' Remember?)

Carpe Mañana: The clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!

45 posted on 04/21/2006 7:16:01 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ

Thought you might be interested in Mia's work on this topic.


46 posted on 04/21/2006 7:21:34 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader; Individual Rights in NJ

In particular her post #38 in this thread.


47 posted on 04/21/2006 7:23:57 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Individual Rights in NJ
Mia, in you post #1 we all see the following:

"The impeached ex-president was accepting an award named after his mentor, the late Sen. William Fulbright of Arkansas."

And along the same line, I ask this:

Mia, don't we all agree that this filthbag of a President -in a solemn ceremony -receive
a Medal of Merit for his selling our nuclear secrets to the Communist Chinese
and all the following co-conspirators of Bill and Hillary's be in attendance:

Ng Lap Seng, Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie; Manlin Foung, Wang Mei Trie, John Huang, Jane Huang, Johnny Chung, Col. Lui, Jing Wei Li, Irene Wu, Liu Tai-ying, Bin Liu, Irene Wu, Nora Lum, Shi JinYu, Shi-Zeng Chen, Xiao Yang, Liu Chao-Ying, Wang Jun, Wah Lim, General Ding Henggao, General Chi HaoTian, General Fu Quanyou, Chief of the General Staff of the PLA, Lt. Gen. Huai Guomo, General Kui Fulin, "Col. Xu", Gen. Liu Huaquing, William Peh, PRC Defense Minister Chi Haotian, China Resources chairman Shen Jueren, Lt. General Xiong Guangkai, Wang Liheng, vice-president of China Aerospace Corp, Gen. Ji Shengde, Bao Peide, 5th Vice Minister of the PRC, Zou Jia Hua, Vice Minister National Technology Planning, Lt. General Xu Qiliang, Chief of Staff of the PLA Air Force, Lt. General Wu Quanxu, Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the PLA, Zhu Roug-ji, Vice Premier of National Finance, Liu Ju-Yuan, Minister of China Aerospace Corporation (made both satellite orbiter version of Long March and the nuclear tippled missile version for the PLA), Keshi Zhan, Yue Chu, Xiping Wang, Nan Nan Xu, Chun-Fat Leung, Chang-Lin Tien, Liao Minglong, Tian Yi, Chen Qingchang, Pan Yongming, Shao Xingsheng, Jiangsu Yongli, Tongsun Park, David Chang and Sister Ping. Bernard Schwartz/Loral, Marvin Rosen, Keshi Zhan, Ken Hsui, Ms Melinda Yee, Hoyt Zia, Ira Sockowitz, Leon A. Panetta, Lanny Davis, Harold Ickes, William Meddoff, Alexis Herman, Jamie Gorelick, Hazel O'Leary, Mark Middleton, Nancy Hernreich, Craig Livingstone, Lynn Cutler, Neal Ainley, Maria Hsia, Robert Meyerhoff, Roger Tamraz, Joseph Landon, David Wang, Indonesian Arief Wiriadinata and his wife Soraya and convicted Miami drug trafficker Jose Cabrera; and also her ongoing association with China Poly Group Corporation / "Polytechnologies Incorporated," along with Hillary's ongoing ties with Ted Sioeng, Mochtar and James Riady and the Lippo Bank-Lippo Group & Lippo Pacific in Indonesia.

49 posted on 04/22/2006 9:36:07 AM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux
* ...in your post/ bttt!
50 posted on 04/22/2006 9:37:34 AM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

thx :)


51 posted on 04/23/2006 9:25:06 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux

WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NOPART ONE
EXPENSIVE CHINA: the clinton legacy

by Mia T et al, 10.17.03, 03.01.06

It is no secret that Hillary's past takes us through a pile of hard, cold cash from the Chinese army, Chinese army agents roaming the White House and photos with a wide variety of scoundrels.

For example, the one prominent name missing from Hillary's recent "tell-all" book is Riady. Mrs. Clinton failed to mention the Riady family at all. One would get the impression that the Riadys were not present in the Clinton White House. Hillary Clinton certainly overlooked listing the table settings and menus for White House dinners with the Riadys.

The Riadys knew the Clintons from their Arkansas years, when Moctar bought out a local bank. Moctar and his son James were close to Bill and Hillary through 1992 and into the White House. Moctar even owned the firm selected by Hillary Clinton to replace the White House travel office.

Riady and Hillary

Moctar and James Riady played a key role in bringing the Clintons to power in Washington. The Indonesian billionaire and his Lippo banking company managed to contribute large sums of money to the Clintons' campaigns even though it was against the law. Moctar's gardener contributed $450,000 directly to Bill Clinton in a single check. James Riady, Moctar's son, eventually pleaded guilty to campaign violations.

The connections between the Riadys and the Clintons have a much more sinister theme than simple foreign money inside U.S. elections. Testimony before the U.S. Senate revealed Moctar Riady's involvement in Chinese espionage. The Lippo Group is in fact a joint venture of China Resources, a trading and holding company "wholly owned" by the Chinese communist government and used as a front for Chinese espionage operations.

Mrs. Clinton not only knew the Riadys but took their money as well. To prove my point I need only to cite photographic evidence. Her picture with Moctar Riady is certainly damning evidence of a relationship that spanned several bank accounts and two decades. It is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. However, Hillary's pictures not only tell stories left out of her book but they also netted $10,000 each for the DNC in illegal donations.

Hillary's Most-Wanted

Mrs. Clinton has left us with a wide selection of photo evidence. Mrs. Clinton has had her photo taken with drug dealer Jorge Cabrera. Jorge donated a load of drug money to the DNC in order to get close to the first lady. Jorge is currently serving federal time for smuggling 3,000 pounds of cocaine into the United States.

READ MORE

52 posted on 04/23/2006 9:37:58 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Your above:

"WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NOPART ONE"

Absolutely CORRECT!!

53 posted on 04/23/2006 7:49:27 PM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Best o'Luck in your search bump
54 posted on 04/24/2006 9:41:49 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jla

thx. I found it!
Will be debuting shortly. ;)


55 posted on 04/24/2006 12:32:41 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I salute your passion and your dedication!


56 posted on 04/24/2006 8:22:25 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader; jla; All
thx :)

MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)

57 posted on 04/26/2006 7:29:06 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux; Wolverine; All
FOUND IT!
MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)

58 posted on 04/26/2006 8:15:42 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
CORRECTIONS + ADDITIONS TO ORIGINAL POST
59 posted on 04/27/2006 4:40:40 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson