Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CanadianConservative; fanfan; backhoe; piasa; Godzilla; nwctwx; All

http://www.brooksbulletin.com/news/national_news.asp?itemid=52877

National News › News Item

"Potential terrorists lurking in Canadian cities, says spy agency"

BRUCE CHEADLE
Monday, May 29, 2006

ARTICLE SNIPPET: "OTTAWA (CP) - Canada has its own crop of homegrown terrorists capable of acts like the deadly attacks on London's transit system last summer, says Canada's spy agency.

"I can tell you that all of the circumstances that led to the London transit bombings . . . are resident here and now in Canada," Jack Hooper, operations director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, told a Senate committee Monday.

The threat from Canadian-bred terrorists is considered by CSIS to be on a par with external terror threats, Hooper said during an appearance with RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli.

He did not, however, say how many homegrown terror suspects there are in Canada, where they live, or which groups they are connected with."


ARTICLE SNIPPET #2: "Hooper pointed to several examples of people who had lived in Canada, and later took part in terrorist attacks. He said a common thread was time spent training at terror camps in Afghanistan."

ARTICLE SNIPPET #2: "Liberal Senator Colin Kenny, the chairman of the committee, said Britain's experience last summer should provide a wake-up call for the problems Canada could encounter with homegrown terrorists.

"They'd been born in country," Kenny said of the group that detonated a series of bombs, killing 52 civilians and four terrorists last July 7."


2,916 posted on 05/29/2006 9:33:40 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Cindy

Correction: Make that last article snippet #3.


2,917 posted on 05/29/2006 9:34:47 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2916 | View Replies ]

To: backhoe; All

Note: The following text is a quote:
---

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/2006/05/011593print.html


May 29, 2006

UK Muslim protests new anti-terror laws: would limit "speaking about jihad"

As Charles Johnson says, "Uh. I think that’s supposed to be the idea." And if it isn't, it should be: there should be clear legislation that specifies that teaching jihad -- which traditionally and primarily has meant warfare against unbelievers in order to establish the hegemony of the Islamic social order -- is unacceptable.

"Muslims targeted by glorification legislation," from The Muslim News, with thanks to LGF:



The Government was condemned last month on its glorification antiterrorism legislation at an event to celebrate Prophet Muhammad (p)’s birthday held on April 18. “The Government is spending more time on anti terror legislation and is taking away Muslims’ civil liberties and freedom,” said Secretary General of Union of Muslim Organisations (UMO), Syed Aziz Pasha. He was responding to Home Office Minister, Fiona Mactaggart, who told the guests that the anti terror legislation was meant “to make us safer” and that the outlawing of glorification of terrorism “does not prevent reasonable speeches.”

Mactaggart said the Government was “looking forward to continuing collaboration with the Muslim community.” It is “this relationship that helps policing work,” she said. But Pasha said anti terror legislation was targeted at the Muslims and the new addition of glorification would prevent them from speaking about jihad as this would be considered as terrorism.

Posted at May 29, 2006 06:01 AM


2,918 posted on 05/29/2006 9:43:07 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2916 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson