Won’t Someone Stop This Tragedy?
Bloomberg’s education campaign is driving Gotham’s Catholic schools out of business.
Sol Stern
18 April 2006
Posted on 04/18/2006 1:01:27 PM PDT by neverdem
|
|
City Journal Won’t Someone Stop This Tragedy? Bloomberg’s education campaign is driving Gotham’s Catholic schools out of business. Sol Stern 18 April 2006 |
Something precious in the lives of many deserving New Yorkers is slowly dying in Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s glittering city. The New York Catholic Archdiocese recently announced that it would close 14 schools, following on last year’s announcement by the Archdiocese of Brooklyn that it would shutter 22 of its schools in Brooklyn and Queens. Located in some of Gotham’s neediest neighborhoods, these schools have served for over a century as a haven for low-income but striving families. Many of the predominantly minority children in those closed schools will now have to attend failing public schools.
The school closings result in part from the inexorable laws of competition. No, I don’t mean that the Catholic schools have fallen behind in the areas of academic achievement or classroom productivity. Quite the contrary. Catholic schools still deliver a far bigger bang for the education buck than the public schools. For example, in last year’s state reading and math tests for 4th and 8th graders, Catholic school students scored from 7 percent to 10 percent higher than their public school counterparts. And the Catholic high school graduation rate is nearly double that of the public high schools. Moreover, Catholic schools deliver these stellar results with per-pupil expenditures remaining about a fourth of the costs of the public schools.
In a truly competitive education world—one, that is, where taxpayer money followed children to their school of choice—the Catholic school sector would be thriving financially as well as academically, prodding the public schools to do better. But with no vouchers or tuition tax credits in place, the Catholic schools are finding it harder and harder to compete financially with an insatiable public school monopoly, ever more expansive under mayoral control. The city’s Department of Education budget now tops $17 billion, or about $15,000 per pupil. This spending growth has allowed Mayor Bloomberg to raise teacher’s salaries by 33 percent. The top public school salary of $93,000 is now double that of the highest paid Catholic schoolteacher. (When I first started writing about Catholic schools ten years ago the salary gap was a “mere” 60 percent.) To try to keep teachers from leaving for the public system, the Catholic schools have had to boost salaries, too, forcing up tuition and putting the squeeze on their low-income families. According to the Brooklyn Archdiocese, average tuition in its schools has risen from $1,659 in 1992 to $3,000 in 2004. This increase has already resulted in an outflow of thousands of low-income families to the public schools.
The Catholic schools could close this gap with more private philanthropic money. Mayor Rudy Giuliani understood this need, believing that a vital Catholic school sector was good for the city. Stymied on taxpayer-funded vouchers, he sponsored a private voucher program for the Catholic schools, bankrolled by a group of New York philanthropists. But our current billionaire mayor has never said a word in support of the Catholic schools and seems to want all the philanthropic money in town to go to his own public school empire. And he and Schools Chancellor Joel Klein have been hugely successful in that venture, raising over $300 million in private funds in just three years. That’s enough money to create an endowment that would forestall all the Catholic school closings, and then some.
Catholic schools are now also at a competitive disadvantage in receiving private philanthropy. Giving to Catholic schools (and many heroic New Yorkers still do give) has always been a matter of individual conscience. Donors don’t usually get their names in the paper for their generosity. They aren’t invited to the mayor’s social events, like the luncheon that the New York Times described as a gathering of “fashionistas, artists, wealthy businessmen or . . . their wealthy wives,” who have “turned public education into a darling cause of the corporate-philanthropic-society set.” As one giddy philanthropist explained to the Times reporter, “There is a club of people in New York that support just about everything—the museums, the libraries. Now, because Michael has such a good name and is so reputable, they are able to transfer that club into the school system.”
Aside from invitations to the mayor’s best parties, members of the “club” get other perks too. They can associate their names with the administration’s highly publicized reform initiatives. For example, billionaire Eli Broad and other philanthropists won public kudos from the mayor for financing the initial planning for his massive reorganization and centralization of the school system. Now, three years later other club members are enjoying equal credit for financing the reorganization of the reorganization and for the new decentralization. Bloomberg’s philanthropists can finance the creation of lots of new small high schools and for money even get a voice in what those schools teach. They can contribute to the Leadership Academy, the most expensive principal-training institute in education history, despite its lack of any track record of success.
The one thing Mayor Bloomberg can’t give the members of his philanthropic club is any assurance that their money will have a significant educational impact. As I pointed out in City Journal (“City’s Pupils Get More Hype than Hope,” Winter 2006), one finds hardly a shred of evidence that all the additional billions in taxpayer funds and the $300 million in private donations have lifted the academic performance of the city’s students.
I wouldn’t dare tell any of the philanthropists where to put their money. Still, as successful business people, they should be able to figure out where their millions could make a real difference, and where a need exists based on hunger, not on appetite.
That's incredible!
Bloomberg is the king of the RINOs. What a worthless POS.
The teacher's unions are happy - increased salaries, no increases in the learning of public school children and finally decreased competition...
No Democrat (and that's what Bloomberg is, deep in his soul) will ever do anything that would be seen as assisting religious-based education.
It's time to get the band back together.
Consider cost of living up there and it's really not that much money for someone at the top of the pay scale.
The Catholic schools support illegal aliens kids and others who can't or won't pay, so now the Catholic Church who claims they will support the poor are kicking the kids out and putting them in public schools where the taxpayers pick up the tab and they overcrowd yet more schools?
Cardinal Mahoney speaks with "forked tongue"?
he fought to have amnesty for the illegals than he needs to keep the kids in their Catholic schools and support them and quit pushing them on taxpayers, You all want and demand amnesty for illegals YOU all support them!!
Bloomberg is heartless. His comment when nearly 24 Queens/Brooklyn schools were closed ("I would like to use those buildings for the public schools".) The man is a pig who also forced the medical students to train in abortion. What can you expect from such a man?
Lawsuits based on what? I attended Catholic schools, and have nothing in particular against them (other than that many are now becoming ultra-liberal), but I don't see how Bloomberg has done anything illegal.
Well, since New York has a homosexual high school, you can't criticize them. Why doesn't San Francisco have a homosexual high school?
Pagans rule here, your boys will aspire to be pimps and your daughters will end up as wanabe bitches or whoes when the schools are done with them.
Unless they teach them to be queers or junkies first..
Do you find something wrong with the city paying to lease closed Catholic schools for public schooling?
Many of the "predominantly minority children" in those closed schools weren't even Catholic to begin with, so I see the closure of these schools as little more than a formal acknowledgement that the Catholic Church simply doesn't have a reason to be in these neighborhoods right now.
This scene is being repeated in older urban areas all over the country.
Yes, because I do not want drugs and guns in my 'hood, thank you! and bumbleberg wanted the buildings for the PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Well, it's sad that the Catholic schools are closing. Better to have the city lease the buildings for public schools than for them to be vacant. But would be better if the Catholic schools were better able to compete.
My child is not Catholic but is in a Catholic school - I would not do it any other way - and we fundraise like the other parents. As I see it , many of the "new immigrants" will not send their kids to Catholic schools even if they have the money.
They are probably more "enlightened" in San Francisco, haha!
There's the entire reason: the Catholic schools' success is an embarrassment to the supporters of government education monopolies.
PLease notice. Cardinal Mahoney is in LA. This article is about New York. That is Cardinal Egan's jurisdiction. Regardless, the Catholic school system has reached out for years to the poor to help in education. I really don't see why this tragedy has to be turn into a thread on illegal immigration. Isn't there enough of those threads on here anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.