Skip to comments.
Does Feminism Control The Bush Administration?
Eagle Forum ^
| Apr. 19, 2006
| Phyllis Schlafly
Posted on 04/18/2006 10:50:33 AM PDT by ncountylee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: ncountylee
Assistant Education Secretary for Civil Rights Stephanie Monroe has announced that the Bush Administration is investigating universities that have fewer women in science and math programs than feminists would like
I can't believe it:D
2
posted on
04/18/2006 10:57:42 AM PDT
by
Vision
("There are no limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence" Ronald Reagan)
To: ncountylee
Partial Birth Abortion ban. You lose Feminazis. Nice try Democrats.
3
posted on
04/18/2006 10:59:37 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The Democrat Party. For those who value slogans over solutions.)
To: Vision
Bush let far too many Clintonistas keep their positions and as a result, democrat values continue to be shoved down our throats.
4
posted on
04/18/2006 11:00:49 AM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
"The feminists expect that their whining and outbursts about alleged discrimination will intimidate men into giving them preferential treatment. The feminists want to rig the system so they will not have to compete with men, but will compete only with other women for a quota of scholarship slots, resources and professorships."
Aint that the truth.
5
posted on
04/18/2006 11:10:58 AM PDT
by
Daytyn71
(Today's Illegals are Tomorrow's Democrats)
To: ncountylee
Assistant Education Secretary for Civil RightsThere should be no such position. In fact, there should not be a Department of Education at all.
6
posted on
04/18/2006 11:13:55 AM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Harry Reid is a Liar;Ted Kennedy is a BIG FAT Liar: edited by tiredoflaundry)
To: Vision
Yes, no doubt about it. President Bush stays up nights worrying about how many women are teaching science and math courses at our colleges and universities.
/s/
7
posted on
04/18/2006 11:14:13 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: ncountylee
...too many anti-family social programs, higher costs for defense and business, and too many fatherless children will cost the next generation much more. But it keeps people who are superior to us from having much new business competition and keeps the labor pool more full.
8
posted on
04/18/2006 11:23:56 AM PDT
by
familyop
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
To: ncountylee
Thanks, Phyllis.
The Bushes qualify for feminists so far as their acts are concerned. Stupidity is often the provence of the GOP.
9
posted on
04/18/2006 11:24:48 AM PDT
by
Spirited
To: ncountylee
I wonder what it would take to elect a conservative President, who will only appoint only conservatives to the cabinet, and have those cabinet secretaries appoint only conservatives to the underling positions.
Obviously it is going to take more than we have put forth so far. Sigh.
To: ConservativeDude
I wonder what it would take to elect a conservative President, who will only appoint only conservatives to the cabinet, and have those cabinet secretaries appoint only conservatives to the underling positions.
_______
I'm thinking you'd have to knock off approx. 46.5% of the US population.
11
posted on
04/18/2006 11:35:54 AM PDT
by
dmz
To: Right Wing Professor
12
posted on
04/18/2006 11:48:33 AM PDT
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: ncountylee
This is utterly insane. Math and sciences are the only area in academia where student performance is measured quantitatively. Either you get the right answer or you don't. There is nothing keeping women out of these programs. These programs are so small in many universitiea and colleges that they would love to bring in more students, regardless of sex. As a matter of fact, a lot of the science geeks would LOVE to have more women in their classes.
The plain fact is that not many people in general are interested in the hard sciences and there is a need for technically competent people. Femisnists are just looking for more places to sprout their political weeds.
13
posted on
04/18/2006 11:52:11 AM PDT
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: ncountylee
There was a big push back in the dotcom daze to get more women interested in engineering. It worked well enough to get them into the engineering schools and programs, but the "science barrier" ended it shortly after that for a lot of them.
14
posted on
04/18/2006 11:54:30 AM PDT
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: ncountylee
Meanwhile, here at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, we identified upwards of 50 minorities and women who had been hired without open searches on the basis of race and sex. We gave the Justice Department the names, the fields, and documents from the university proving it had been done. Attorney General Gonzales discontinued the investigation for political reasons.
To: Right Wing Professor
He seems to be pursuing the border issue with an equal amount of enthusiasm...and competence.
To: ncountylee
To: randog
"There was a big push back in the dotcom daze to get more women interested in engineering. It worked well enough to get them into the engineering schools and programs, but the "science barrier" ended it shortly after that for a lot of them."
Yes, I kept track of that trend and know where many of them went. Quite a few of them were relegated to being overpaid administrators, spokespersons and web page writers for labs and other tech.-related offices. Those who won't do the work can still be bosses. And they can vent their ire by concentrating on hiring men from Arab and other Asian or South American countries to do the work.
We need new competition in business, IMO.
18
posted on
04/18/2006 12:04:58 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
To: joesnuffy
He seems to be pursuing the border issue with an equal amount of enthusiasm...and competence.In fact, if I list all the reasons I voted for Bush, and all the issues he's let me down on, they're pretty much the same list!
To: ncountylee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson