Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to Watch for Gas Price-gouging: Bush
Reuters ^ | 4/18/2006 | Staff Writers

Posted on 04/18/2006 8:09:46 AM PDT by ex-Texan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-446 next last
To: jpl
Pass an Executive Order to begin drilling in ANWR, effective immediately.

No way the Constitution Party is against all executive orders and want them eliminated but of course they hate Bush anwyway. ;-)

81 posted on 04/18/2006 8:47:06 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
Yep. Sad how few understand this, as they beg and/or demand that the gov't "do something" about "price gouging". In a free market, these sorts of issues take care of themselves.

As I understand it, the freemarketeers feel there is no such thing as gouging in a free market...'If you own it, you set the price'...

Seems at one time, our gov't came up with laws that prevented this from happening by allowing (and demanding) competition, thus preventing monopolys to exhist as they currently do in the oil business...But the monopolys bought the gov't...

So what's the recourse???

Guess we'll just continue to pay the price, on our knees...

82 posted on 04/18/2006 8:47:39 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: FreeInWV
Too bad he's not "concerned" enough to author a real energy plan!

Hear, hear!!! I've had the same thoughts.
84 posted on 04/18/2006 8:48:16 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
..my local Shell station (Royal Dutch Oil) is only a couple of pennies below 3 bucks for regular.

I could go down the street to ARCO (British Petroleum) and save a few cents.

Bottome line: yes, out in here in SoCal I feel gouged--but I just haven't been able to find a good deal on a hydrogen car...

85 posted on 04/18/2006 8:48:47 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: santorumlite

Exactly. That is the whole problem in a nutshell. These traders can line their pockets at will- every time there is a hint of trouble.


86 posted on 04/18/2006 8:48:53 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Here is what the problem is. The people or companies that buy futures are gambling. The oil it self has not really gone up. It's the people who trade in the futures market that are making the oil and gasoline go up. Look U.S. crude oil futures hit a record of $70.88 a barrel on Tuesday on fears of supply disruptions

See that ON FEAR that is the only reason. That has always been the case, even before the war.

87 posted on 04/18/2006 8:49:01 AM PDT by AIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf
Take your pick!

To be honest, I think he's just plain tired and getting a lot of bad advice lately.

88 posted on 04/18/2006 8:49:19 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: JackDanielsOldNo7
Why would Exxon not use the 400 million on researching alternative fuels investing in a refinery etc? But instead they spent 400 million on a retirement package.

I was just discussing this today with one of my colleagues. That is a lot of cash to be throwing away when they could have plowed it back into the business to grow it further, maybe alternate fuels, as you suggest, or even run-of-the-mill things like furthering exploration of new deposits or building additional refining capacity. Shareholders should be up in arms over this waste of company resources.

89 posted on 04/18/2006 8:49:32 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; CollegeRepublican

This could also be implemented on any river. Simply substitute the floatation devices with a paddlewheel attached to a turbine.

It takes very little electricity to separate the hydrogen from the water. We did it with twelve measley volts in seventh grade.


90 posted on 04/18/2006 8:49:58 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: ex-Texan

My wife is pissed, but we will not this summer be taking our usual drive to Destin, Florida.


92 posted on 04/18/2006 8:50:58 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (More people died in Ted Kennedy's car than hunting with Dick Cheney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Hi Nathan Zachary-

Very rarely are there calm seas along the shorelines of the lower-48 for more than a few hours at a time. The reason everyone doesn't have one on the end of their boat dock is because what are they individually going to do with their warehoused hydrogen stores?

~ Blue Jays ~

93 posted on 04/18/2006 8:51:24 AM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Gouging= golden parachutes, Maga-bonuses, stock options, etc.
95 posted on 04/18/2006 8:51:38 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Water turbines, etc. have been around for a century. They just aren't very practical.

Besides, there are plenty of hydro electric dams in the world. Every river that can be damed- is.

96 posted on 04/18/2006 8:52:19 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf
Spot on, professor, and well said. Sadly though, folks with santorumlite's misconceived notions cannot be persuaded by sweet reason.

Nor, ftm, would such folks ever dream of putting their capital where their mouth (er, keyboard) is. I'm coming to be very much afraid that nothing will satisfy this crowd short of a replay of the 1970s: shortages, outages, long lines for gasoline, ''old oil'', ''new oil'', ''new new oil'', the lot. All of which to be brought (back) to us by the respective founts of all wisdom, to wit, gov't regulators.

Sigh.

97 posted on 04/18/2006 8:52:19 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf
Take your pick!

Ouch! You are asking the Bushbots to deny their god.
98 posted on 04/18/2006 8:52:33 AM PDT by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

ping


99 posted on 04/18/2006 8:52:41 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: capitalist229
Wrong. The declining dollar is causing oil prices to rise.

Soros (head of the ANSWER group) plays the money market. The more the American dollar declines, the more money he makes (which is why he's hard core democrat. A recession is a boom for him.)

100 posted on 04/18/2006 8:52:51 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-446 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson