Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to Watch for Gas Price-gouging: Bush
Reuters ^ | 4/18/2006 | Staff Writers

Posted on 04/18/2006 8:09:46 AM PDT by ex-Texan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Tuesday he is "concerned" about high gasoline prices, and pledged that the U.S. government will keep a close watch out for profiteering.

"I'm concerned about higher gasoline prices," Bush said at a Rose Garden news conference to name new staff appointments.

"The government has the responsibility to make sure that we watch very carefully and investigate possible price-gouging, and we will do just that," Bush said in unprompted remarks about energy prices.

U.S. crude oil futures hit a record of $70.88 a barrel on Tuesday on fears of supply disruptions in Iran stemming from its nuclear standoff with the West, as well as lingering outages in Nigeria.

U.S. retail gasoline prices rose 10 cents last week to average $2.78 a gallon, up 29 cents over the last three weeks and 55 cents higher than a year ago, the government said on Monday.

Bush said high crude oil prices, rising summer driving demand and a switch to new motor gasoline standards is keeping gasoline prices high.

"It's tight supply worldwide and we've got increasing demand from countries like India and China, which means that any disruption of supply ... (is) going to cause the price of crude to go up," Bush said.

More drivers will take to the road this summer, which will also boost demand, he said.

"At this time of year people are beginning to drive more, getting out on the highways, taking a little time off," Bush said. "That increasing demand is also part of the reason the price of gasoline is going up."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; fuelgouging; fuelprice; fuelpricing; gasolineprices; gasprices; gouge; pricefix; pricefixing; pricegouging
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-446 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

"Bottom line is, what do you trust more? The free market system, or government bureaucracy?"

There has to be another choice or we're doomed.


181 posted on 04/18/2006 9:45:34 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
"The government has the responsibility to make sure that we watch very carefully and investigate possible price-gouging, and we will do just that," Bush said in unprompted remarks about energy prices.

Frightening that this kind of imbecilic comment comes from the highest elected official in the country.

182 posted on 04/18/2006 9:45:49 AM PDT by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf

I'm all for the free market. But reality should not be ignored when dealing with limited availability commodities that are controlled by a handful of producers -- commodities that are indeed central to the continued functioning of the overall economic engine.

Regulation can be stifling, but it can also be crucial. Indeed, corporations and securities markets are legal fictions that work precisely because of a regulatory framework that fosters availability, confidence, and risk taking while also checking the abuses that are otherwise inherent in these fictional business entities and marketplaces.


183 posted on 04/18/2006 9:46:05 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf

Europe? Their pump price is high because of taxes. They buy oil at the same price we do, don't they? (except for back door deals)


184 posted on 04/18/2006 9:46:17 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf

Don't we regulate electricity? Shouldn't we be glad that 5 power companies don't run the country's electricity and charge everyone hundreds of dollars a day? Like gas, yes we could theoretically live without it, but realistically we need it almost as much as food or water.


185 posted on 04/18/2006 9:47:16 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

And such moves are exacerbated by the market participants' view of what supply and demand levels WILL BE in future.


186 posted on 04/18/2006 9:48:30 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: santorumlite
The real enemy is the moron speculators on wall street.

Anti freedom rhetoric from know nothings on this site is an embarassment to anyone except liberals.

187 posted on 04/18/2006 9:49:06 AM PDT by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: santorumlite
The real enemy is the moron speculators on wall street.

Anti freedom rhetoric from know nothings on this site is an embarassment to anyone except liberals.

188 posted on 04/18/2006 9:49:08 AM PDT by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #189 Removed by Moderator

To: E. Pluribus Unum
We don't live in never-never land. Reality is what it is. Prices go up when demand exceeds supply. Period.

And your evidence that gasoline is in short supply? Seems to me that the fantasy is the simplistic soundbites of the economic theorists.

190 posted on 04/18/2006 9:49:33 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
Gouging= golden parachutes, Maga-bonuses, stock options, etc.

Class envy = pathetic response of bitter losers who realise they failed to do what it would take to end up on top.

191 posted on 04/18/2006 9:50:05 AM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf

The market is very smart. Thats why when the market was allowed to operate freely with no checks nothing bad happened in 1929. /sarc off


192 posted on 04/18/2006 9:50:20 AM PDT by ccc_jr (Si vis pacem, para bellum - Flavius Vegetius Renatus c. 375 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
It's time to break up some of these mega oil companies.

Liberal nonsense.

193 posted on 04/18/2006 9:51:38 AM PDT by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
Sadly correct.

Sadly agreed with by pretend conservatives.

194 posted on 04/18/2006 9:53:19 AM PDT by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
The solution is to eliminate boutique blends right now, start building refineries, and start giving funding to new energy research.

Why would Exxon spend a billion dollars to build a refinery that would REDUCE their $3B quarterly profits at the pump? Boutique blends and tight supply chains are to the advantage when the commodity is a Must Have item.

195 posted on 04/18/2006 9:55:12 AM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #196 Removed by Moderator

To: OKIEDOC

197 posted on 04/18/2006 9:56:26 AM PDT by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #198 Removed by Moderator

To: IowaProf
Do you think there are huge barriers to entry into the energy market over and above the natural barriers? If so, state them.

Exploration, drilling, refining, pipeline construction, transportation (sea and land), capital acquisition and carry, etc., etc.

What do you mean by societal dependence on oil?

Automobiles (that carry suburbanites to jobs and form the very basis of personal mobility in the US), mass transit, cargo transit (from freight rail to trucks to barges to cargo ships), drug manufacturing, plastics manufacturing (from pipe to dashboards to pill bottles), paints, roofing, electricity generation, etc., etc.

Is there dependence because oil companies compete to deliver oil at a price the market is willing to pay?

No.

If you think we are gouging here what do you think they are doing in Europe?

Taxing the living daylights out of it, and stalling the economy in the process.

199 posted on 04/18/2006 9:57:39 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
Gouging= golden parachutes, Maga-bonuses, stock options, etc.

More newbie pretend conservatives chime in.

200 posted on 04/18/2006 9:57:49 AM PDT by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-446 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson