My sources for what? For saying you have no idea what you are talking about? Let's put it this way...the countless friends and acquaintances I have currently working at the Pentagon, have more on their minds then clever nicknames stolen from the pages of DU. And they are honored to work for Rumsfeld. In the joint command in which I currently work, Rumsfeld is regarded a great leader doing an outstanding job during a difficult time in history. His televised press conferences are about the only thing more popular than televised car chases, and folks love to watch him slap down the media that has done more to damage our military and effort in Iraq than any terrorist organization.
Bottomline, the military is full of educated professionals who not only understand what Rumsfeld is doing, but are dedicated to helping him succeed. You may want to believe the media portrayal that it is full of a bunch of thumbsuckers thinking up clever nicknames, but that is not reality.
You've purported in your profile: "I enjoy a spirited debate on FreeRepublic, but you better be willing to support your contentions with factual support, or I will quickly lose interest in anything you have to say. That especially applies to conspiracy theorists and anyone who thinks name calling is a useful debate technique"...
So I again ask for your "factual support"...my sources actually WORK at the Pentagon and have often been the anonomous (because of their active-duty status) ones usually reported in the MSM.