Replies

My sources for what? For saying you have no idea what you are talking about? Let's put it this way...the countless friends and acquaintances I have currently working at the Pentagon, have more on their minds then clever nicknames stolen from the pages of DU. And they are honored to work for Rumsfeld.

You've purported in your profile: "I enjoy a spirited debate on FreeRepublic, but you better be willing to support your contentions with factual support, or I will quickly lose interest in anything you have to say. That especially applies to conspiracy theorists and anyone who thinks name calling is a useful debate technique"...

So I again ask for your "factual support"...my sources actually WORK at the Pentagon and have often been the anonomous (because of their active-duty status) ones usually reported in the MSM.

So, you know who is leaking from the Pentagon, and you are not telling anyone? Why is that?

You better have a good explanation, because some of those leaks breached security during a time of war, and I want to know who they are. And furthermore, if you do not turn them in for violating security, you are just as guilty as they are.

"So I again ask for your "factual support"...my sources actually WORK at the Pentagon and have often been the anonomous (because of their active-duty status) ones usually reported in the MSM."

That is actually pretty funny. You say your "sources" actually work at the Pentagon and have "often been the anonymous ones usually reported in the MSM." Sounds like your sources are a bunch of cowards to me. They also don't appear to be especially bright. Calling Rumsfeld "Dumsfeld" is not exactly an indicator of high personal intelligence. Regardless, since your "facts" are based entirely on mysterious Pentagon insiders widely quoted by our anti-American media, color me unimpressed.

Here are my facts...
1. Unless you believe the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is a liar, he is on record today refuting everything you claim. (I'd quote him but the official transcript is not out yet)
2. Unless you believe the former (now retired) Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Gen Myers, is a liar, he is on record as of Sunday refuting what you claim.
3. Unless you believe Gen Franks (retired) is a liar, he is on record several times refuting what you claim.
4. Unless you believe Gen Delong (retired) is a liar, he is on record refuting everything you say.
5. You must believe I am a liar, because I currently work in a Joint HQ's with constant interaction with folks in the Pentagon, and I refute everything you say.

So to counter that, you offer mysterious Pentagon insiders who won't reveal their names, but are often quoted in the media. Do you believe all the folks (active and retired) who are on record saying you are wrong are liars, or do you have something better to offer than your mystery friends?