Posted on 04/18/2006 3:26:57 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
See post #2620
There is proof that he had left by 12:30 at the very latest.
Question #1: Do we know why there were two strippers....and what exactly they did for their 'show'? Often when there's two strippers...they are doing things to each other involving 'toys'...hence penetration.
Question #2: So no DNA material was found on the stripper that matched the Lacrosse Team....this includes hairs (of any kind)right? If she was penetrated in 3 areas wouldn't there be at least 1 hair found somewhere on something?
Wondering....I'm not the expert you are....LOL!!!!!!!!
Thank-you. I was just referring to the statement that the players said Reade wasn't present at the party. The video Abrams had on MSNBC of the photos show that Reade was indeed at the party watching the dancers. I do believe he left early.
I'm no expert on these things, that's for sure. My understanding about DNA was that if there was as much as a hair found on her clothing or body they could match it to the DNA samples taken from the players. But none of it matched.
But now we're hearing that hair sample and other DNA tests are expected today so I must be wrong how this all works.
Thunderstorms here so I'm logging off...bbl
I thought the strippers got $400 each for the "dance"?
Where did the other $1,600 come from?
Previous "clients"?
Be careful!!!!! ;)
Her orginal statement talks about $2000.
Has it occurred to anyone that maybe they should take a DNA sample from the OTHER stripper? Seems her DNA would have been on any such device/toy.
I'd love to ask the other stripper a few questions. I wonder what she did for the half hour she was waiting for the accuser.
Thanks maggief,
I had no idea how close all this is to where I work, near Hillborough and 15/501.
Yes, Thanks to Howlin she sent me the link at posting #2004
Nah, it is a white conspiracy. They're all lying. The ATM cam was rigged. The cab driver was paid a bribe. The restaurant thing was staged on an earlier date to cover the accused.
Wow! Someone with some sense actually posting on the Duke thread? :-) Fascinating stuff, Wally!
Well....that's the next question isn't it....if indeed there was that kind of thing going on at the party.....
The Abram's Today Show clip is no longer available. Did they pull it because of the pictures? I watched a replay on MSNBC and the pictures were edited out.
I bet they pulled it because of those pictures.
So maybe she's not a local? Maybe she doesn't know that rape has to be with a male sex organ?
All said, I can't imagine someone being so bare-it-all chance taking unless she thought she could parlay that into some $. That's a nasty thing, if that's the case. You'd think she'd be more attentive to her reputation.
"So we up North live in harmony? Puleeze."
I've responded to this type of comment several times.
If you aren't going to read all the posts then don't comment.
It just happens that I actually do live in an area where racial tensions are not as big a problem as they are in the large cities or in the south.
Maybe they want to save it for Abrams show as an "exclusive"--I think Katie Couric said he was the only reporter to have the pictures.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.