Posted on 04/18/2006 3:26:57 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
Could be!
Are you sure?
Good for you.
Well, I don't do drugs these days, but back in my mid-20s GHB was something that I self-ingested a few times at rave parties. A small amout "loosens you up" w/out the after effects of alcohol.
Just because she has rohypnol in her system does not mean that she was 'drugged'. I know first-hand, and I know about 50 other people that I used to party with that would testify to this use of the drug. It is hypothetically possible that she self-ingested too much GHB in order to help her "perform" for the Dookies.
Regardless of any rohypnol, the lack of DNA will make this case almost impossible to prosecute.
yes
Isn't Finnerty the one charged with the most offenses?
Sure, why not? The party was at a private residence - not in a dorm.
College kids party - that's what they do.
Attachment For Application For Search Warrant
4. Property belonging to 27 y/o B/F victim to include but not limited to a white 6-inch shoe.
Description of items to be seized
7. Property belonging to --------------to include but not limited to a purse, wallet, make-up and make-up bag, cellular camera telephone, and a shoe.
In the inventory of seized property there is no mention of the 6 inch shoe having been found.
I wonder where it went?
No problem here.
I bow to both your housefaking,
hhmm,
HouseKEEPING skills :)
She was photographed at the door with her purse. But maybe the description of items just said purse because cops don't know the diff between that and a make-up bag which she did leave behind.
WOW! I leave for a couple of hours and look what happens.
Now what happens Howlin??
If there is evidence that the two indicted were not there when Kim and Cyrstal arrived, will their defense attorneys ask for charged to be dismissed???
One of the attorneys, Cheshire, made is sound as if they were going to trial.
I certainly wouldn't do that and risk getting a bias jury.
She didn't have it on in the very first picture; for all we know, she didn't bring it.
Housefaking. ROFL. I love that.
that's why one should always smile when being photographed. Tom DeLay got it right.
BTW, she first told them that she was missing $2000.
That $2,000 she claims she was missing is the one thing that makes me think she has a john and she stiffed him. Pardon the pun.
I think he shot it all today.
Anyone notice that the motions for the sealed indictments were dated April 12?
(Or has this been discussed? I'm playing catchup.)
I don't know. This NYT article quotes Kerry Sutton as being told by Nifong that all three captains living in the house have been cleared. Interestingly, Seligmann is one of the six players the captains told LE wasn't at the party. Sutton said the defense lawyers thought "Who?" when he was named. How odd.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/18/sports/18cnd-duke.html?ex=1303012800&en=7e1ffdf11a4daa51&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.