Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bondjamesbond

>>>So nobody is allowed to talk about anything until all information has been discovered and all the potential trials have been concluded?

There you go twisting again. Copy and paste where I said this.

>>>What I will not do is say a film-maker should not deal with a subject altogether.

Copy and paste where I said this.


81 posted on 04/16/2006 6:53:21 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia
Copy and paste where I said this.

Your Post #77

And since you just admitted that we don't know all the accounts of Flight 93, how will this 'interpretation' be used for tainting juries for upcoming trials?

Does this statement not indicate that it is wrong for this movie to have been made because of the potential for tainting future jury pools?

If this potential for tainting future potential jury pools is to be a reason films should not be made, would that not preclude the production of films on a wide variety of subjects?

85 posted on 04/16/2006 7:03:59 PM PDT by bondjamesbond (RICE 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson