My statement refers to all accounts. I guess, if I wanted to be abundantly clear, I would say "all accounts that I have seen", since I have not seen all of them. But the accounts that I have seen indicate that the treatment is fairlyl straightforward and factual. Haven't you seen the same accounts?
If we wait for all intel to be released and all enemies to be named, we will never see anything about 9/11. In your opinion, what is the critical intel and who are the enemies that you are referring to.
In any case, you can rest assured that the anti-War left will not be at all shy about using the attacks of 9/11 to make their points. I don't see why they should be given a monopoly on the subject.
And since you just admitted that we don't know all the accounts of Flight 93, how will this 'interpretation' be used for tainting juries for upcoming trials?