[catholicfreeper]

Without debating your comments as to the CFR article. Yes, I am a free trader. As to the loopholes. Those loopholes can be fixed in Conference. No one is thinking that the Senate Bill is going to be the final product. The provisions that you are concerned about will be addressed there. The House members will demand it. The important thing is to get to the two bill to conference and start hammering out the differences.

[nicmarlo]

Without debating your comments as to the CFR article. Yes, I am a free trader. As to the loopholes. Those loopholes can be fixed in Conference.

There is nothing to debate about the CFR article; it's a fact. Read the report for yourself. (Building a North American Community [PDF]). BTW, there IS a difference between free trade and selling America and Americans down the river in the process. What has been planned has less to do with free trade than with tearing down America's sovereignty. By other of your comments, you've already indicated which side of the "debate" you're on with that score.

As far as fixing "loopholes" so that America has a "more sound immigration policy," that's just as likely to happen as current immigration laws being enforced. If you think it's more likely that "new" immigration laws will be enforced, you're fooling only yourself.

"The indefensible canNOT be defended. Only diverted and obscured by smoke and mirrors." -- Liberator