Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: catholicfreeper; Liberator
Without debating your comments as to the CFR article. Yes, I am a free trader. As to the loopholes. Those loopholes can be fixed in Conference.

There is nothing to debate about the CFR article; it's a fact. Read the report for yourself. (Building a North American Community [PDF]). BTW, there IS a difference between free trade and selling America and Americans down the river in the process. What has been planned has less to do with free trade than with tearing down America's sovereignty. By other of your comments, you've already indicated which side of the "debate" you're on with that score.

As far as fixing "loopholes" so that America has a "more sound immigration policy," that's just as likely to happen as current immigration laws being enforced. If you think it's more likely that "new" immigration laws will be enforced, you're fooling only yourself.

"The indefensible canNOT be defended. Only diverted and obscured by smoke and mirrors." -- Liberator

65 posted on 04/16/2006 2:27:42 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo

I am not for some trinational union of Canada, USA, and Mexico. I am for lowering trade borders etc. I am also not an open border extremist that believes let anyone walk across. I have read excerpts from the CFR and comments about it. However I will read the whole thing to see if there is any fire there.


66 posted on 04/16/2006 2:31:25 PM PDT by catholicfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson