[pinz-n-needlez]

We may have to wait until the deaths of these men, these devoted nad brave former generals and the reading of their wills and last testaments.

They have responsibilities to their families and wives, but Clinton can't muzzle them beyond the grave... or can he? How precient to force nondislosure statements of his disgruntled military retirees, and then use the reverse action to go after Bush and his attempts to protect and defend our nation.

Yes, the legacy is still being written. But it ain't pretty, and I pray to God that it comes back in time to stop Hillary before she starts the next round of the dismantling of America.

Pinz

[pinz-n-needlez]

Ping to #745

No way are these retired generals' statements coincidince or happenstance.

Pinz

[snugs]

If widows are entitled to some form of retirement benefits for example in the company where I work they get half benefits after their spouse dies then maybe he can still muzzle because their entitlements could be under threat - just a thought.

Also would any children be really aware of what happened their parents may have felt it safer not to have told them - so the real truth from the families may never be known.