Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Critics Tread A Line Rarely Crossed
The Tampa Tribune ^ | Apr 16, 2006 | SCOTT SHANE The New York Times

Posted on 04/15/2006 11:14:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Edited on 04/16/2006 3:45:19 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON - Last week, as the chorus of retired generals calling for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation grew larger and louder, Marine Gen. Peter Pace stood beside the defense secretary and did what some experts say is his military duty.

"As far as Pete Pace is concerned, this country is exceptionally well-served by the man standing on my left," Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon.


(Excerpt) Read more at news.tbo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; rumsfeld; wrongheaded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2006 11:15:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I had no use for Clinton generals when they were on active duty and I have no use for them now! We are at WAR and they are undermining the Secretary of Defense.

Those generals need recalled to active duty IMHO and then read the riot act for their actions to undermine the Department of Defense and its leader and their former boss. They make me sick!


2 posted on 04/15/2006 11:19:35 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Elect Bob Sullivan OK Governor -- Throw out Dem Gov DoLittle Henry in 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"...the chorus of retired generals calling for...onslaught of attacks..."

Six does not a chorus make, nor an onslaught. In fact, there are now more retired general officers speaking out in defense of the Secretary then against. But back to this chorus and onslaught:

In the Department of Defense there are:

34 - four star generals/admirals

124 - three star generals/admirals

278 - two star generals/admirals

439 - one star generals/admirals

Throw in the U.S. Coast Guard and you have 900 generals and admirals on active duty today. Roughly 15-20% of these flag officers retires each year.

Even a conservative low end estimate is that over 800 generals, many with service in Afghanistan and Iraq, have retired on Secretary Rumsfeld's watch. And they call six a chorus and onslaught?

3 posted on 04/15/2006 11:21:06 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Correction: make that retired generals AND ADMIRALS.


4 posted on 04/15/2006 11:22:41 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Power struggle, undertaken by people who don't see any danger serious enough to distract them from their goal of removing conservatives from high positions.


5 posted on 04/15/2006 11:23:42 PM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It seems the media is now going to attack General Pace because it's his duty to speak up for the SecDef. Is this paper a liberal rag like the Slimes or WaPo?


6 posted on 04/15/2006 11:24:19 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If I'm recalling correctly, Zinni had some contemptuous words about Rumsfeld and the war planning while he was active. He claimed something about always going after the middle-east to protect the Jews.
7 posted on 04/15/2006 11:26:26 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
One thing to keep in mind with Zinni, he's the bastard that engineered the USS Cole disaster then urged the White House not to take any sanctions against Pakistan, where the bombers had come from.

When he retired he took up a very lucrative position with a communications firm with a major contract...in Pakistan.

8 posted on 04/15/2006 11:28:47 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Its a New York Times writer....


9 posted on 04/15/2006 11:29:47 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks, completely missed it.


10 posted on 04/15/2006 11:31:06 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I stand corrected, he was actually retired when he spoke about Rumsfeld so whatever he said about Rumsfeld is just Freedom of Speech now.
11 posted on 04/15/2006 11:32:20 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Agreed.

Time for them to just fade away


12 posted on 04/15/2006 11:33:23 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

These Generals certainly could be recalled under the provisions of the UCMJ. Once appointed an officer in the military, further service is always at the discretion and pleasure of congress and the President.


13 posted on 04/15/2006 11:33:30 PM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
See this too from the Scotsman in Scotland ( The Generals are mentioned and the Bush Administration is called discredited ):

Quagmire and crisis ~ Iran and the West

14 posted on 04/15/2006 11:34:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative
"Once appointed an officer in the military, further service is always at the discretion and pleasure of congress and the President."

Yes and no.

An officer who resigns his/her commission, and has no remaining service obligation of their original 8 years active/reserve, is free and clear.

In the case of these generals, they are retired which does make then eligible for recall to active duty.

15 posted on 04/15/2006 11:37:50 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Cripes...I'm throwing out my instant oatmeal in the morning. It's apparent that it can cause hallucinations.
16 posted on 04/15/2006 11:39:12 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
General Anthony Zinni was commander of CentCom during the Clinton years. His predecessor was General "Stormin" Norman Schwartzkopf and his successor, General Tommy Franks.

Just a bit of perspective, Chief. (I know you know this.) It's for the edification of others and enhances your comments.
17 posted on 04/15/2006 11:43:13 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Order of Battle: Sink or capture as Prize, MS Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Out of nearly a thousand flag officers a few socialists have taken revenge by shooting off their mouths. The military has been changed radically. There are always going to be a few who resist change.
Don't forget that the same leadership they criticize lead them in the most effective war in the history of the world. I think that Rumsfield's record on the war screams of success as these sore retired losers whine for a few more minutes in the limelight.
18 posted on 04/15/2006 11:44:00 PM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

Still well worth pointing out. Thanks.


19 posted on 04/15/2006 11:44:51 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Off the subject a bit. While I was running a search of Zinni I ran across an antiwar site called none other than antiwar. (you know what) and in the donate column it states that all donations are tax deductible. Is this possible for a privately owned site?
20 posted on 04/15/2006 11:46:43 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson