Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smart growth can get even smarter
The Times Online ^ | April 7, 2006 | Jerry Davicch

Posted on 04/15/2006 5:12:19 PM PDT by Lorianne

Smart growth. Low-impact construction. Sustainable development. Open-space ordinances. Greenway planning.

These land-use buzz phrases are not new, but some environmentalists think they're also not used nearly enough by local planners, developers, contractors and even homeowners.

Enter the Chicago Wilderness consortium, an alliance of 190 organizations in the Chicago metro region -- including several in Northwest Indiana -- eager to assist, educate and work hands-on with new developments.

One development -- singled out by consortium members as a model development in the making -- is Portage's effort to recapture part of the Lake Michigan shoreline and create a beachfront park through Phase 1 of the Marquette Greenway proposal.

Another example is the new Porter County tourism visitor center under construction, built with smart-growth design principles in mind, said Tom Anderson, director of Save the Dunes Council, a longtime member.

Members are eager to help local residents who want to protect the region's biodiversity, enhance their property and improve property values with good conservation designs.

"Chicago Wilderness can provide the methodology, the tools, even funding help," Anderson said.

Consortium members include experts, government agencies and municipal departments more prepared to help than ever before, said Reggie Korthals, environmental director for the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission.

"Local planners have identified a need of more education for smart growth and conservation design principles, and this is what Chicago Wilderness can do," Korthals said.

NIRPC is part of the consortium that reached a new critical mass in this region by joining forces with the Porter County Plan Commission, the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore and the city of Portage, among others.

Another prime example of smart development in the region is Coffee Creek Center in Chesterton, a 640-acre new urbanism project developed to include a 167-acre Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve, marked for protection from development and beautified with prairie grasses and native plants.

However, Korthals is somewhat critical of the development, noting it has neither met initial expectations nor grown as fast as it should have.

But Anderson suggested giving it time, hinting at a large new development within the center.

Anderson, Korthals and Wendy Smith, education coordinator of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, are unsure if planners of the proposed hotel inside Indiana Dunes State Park will ask the consortium for help. But they hope so.

Other "biodiversity recovery projects" currently under way across the region include the Marquette Park lagoons, and a seven-mile, 500-foot wide, north-south utility corridor, owned by Nisource Inc., that's being restored.

Local environmental activist Lee Botts, of Miller, is creating a master "restoration inventory" of projects completed or under way, expected for completion this fall, to showcase Northwest Indiana's triumphs -- and needs.

Korthals singled out key "go-to planners" in the region who have their pulse on such smart growth, including A.J. Monroe, Portage's director of community development and planning, and Bob Thompson, director of the Porter County Planning Department.

Consortium members said local planners have expressed interest in learning more about environmentally friendly development practices, but there simply weren't enough people or resources organized to serve their needs. Until now.

CASEY RIFFE | THE TIMES Grass grows around an insulated metal beam that litters an area of the Portage beachfront at the mouth of the Burns Waterway. The area is to be made into a public-access park, beach and recreation area.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: construction; development; propertyrights

1 posted on 04/15/2006 5:12:21 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Agenda 21


2 posted on 04/15/2006 5:14:15 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Di'ver'si'ty (adj.): A compound word derived from the root words: division; perversion; adversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; Dog Gone

My town is full of parks, the only ones used are the ball parks.


3 posted on 04/15/2006 6:14:38 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Kooks For Kinky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

I love the term "smart growth". That indicates any other idea than their agenda is "stupid growth."

Seize the terminology. That's the critical first step.


4 posted on 04/15/2006 6:19:14 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Oh goody. Can we live 500 people/acre the way that Club Sierra wants us to? (yes, this is actually true).


5 posted on 04/15/2006 6:20:30 PM PDT by sauropod ("Age is just a number" - Brenda Frese, UMD Women's Basketball Coach, 4/4/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
That is almost twice the size of a cell at Alcatraz.


6 posted on 04/15/2006 6:34:42 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Kooks For Kinky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Environment supporters think smart growth is when they put homes so close together you can speak to your neighbor with two tin cans and a string. They think that a good view is being able to look out your bathroom window directly into your neighbors that is 5 feet away.They think that 3 feet of grass between your neighbors home and yours is more than adequate. They think these homes should sell for $500,000 dollars. and they do. Huge houses on lots barely big enough to spit without getting it on your neighbors lawn.


7 posted on 04/15/2006 6:37:34 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

Wilderness in Chicago? LOL Thought it ws The Jungle.


8 posted on 04/15/2006 6:37:51 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

If municipalities would adopt a land-value tax instead of the more socialistic property tax, smart growth would occur on its own.


9 posted on 04/15/2006 6:38:17 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (A nickel bag gets sold in the park. I WANT IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
My town is full of parks, the only ones used are the ball parks.

Same here. Lots of parks. Lots of extra effort for law enforcement to patrol. Few users. Lots of maintenance for water and cutting grass. The ball park areas add extra trouble by encouraging people to fill all the available parking in the adjoining neighborhood streets. That necessitates special parking permits for the residents and extra work for parking enforcement to ticket parties who don't belong there. There is also a cost for lighting the ballpark areas...others are closed at sunset. There is also the public restroom problem. A target for vandalism and a location of opportunity for child pervert predators. All in all, the parks are a really bad deal.

10 posted on 04/15/2006 6:40:25 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
They think these homes should sell for $500,000 dollars. and they do. Huge houses on lots barely big enough to spit without getting it on your neighbors lawn.

The free market at work.

11 posted on 04/15/2006 6:41:18 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

I passed a softball park at 3AM, coming in from out of town to see it was all lit up and do mean all.


12 posted on 04/15/2006 6:53:36 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Kooks For Kinky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

You are probably right.IMO people who buy these shacks are far from smart. You can buy a nice place off by itself for less. You just have to shop around.


13 posted on 04/15/2006 7:01:36 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I passed a softball park at 3AM, coming in from out of town to see it was all lit up and do mean all.

The average joe thinks that is free because nobody is charging admission at the gate. That average joe probably isn't a property tax payer. There is no free lunch. The lawn mowing staff gets paid $10/hour.

14 posted on 04/15/2006 7:08:41 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Seize the terminology. That's the critical first step.

Astute observation. Definitions are the guardians of reason and logic.

15 posted on 04/15/2006 7:19:19 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Central planning and socialism.

Sound familiar?

The Soviet Union collapsed, so we're trying to recreate it here.

16 posted on 04/15/2006 7:38:11 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Members are eager to help local residents who want to protect the region's biodiversity, enhance their property and improve property values with good conservation designs...sad that for many residents in such developments, the major focus of their lives becomes the upkeep of their properties and preservation of their "open spaces" - the biweekly newsletter of one "planned community" leads its topics index with reference to reports of the latest decisions by its arcitectual review board, which must pass on the appropriateness of even such minute home projects as new rain gutters. Next come reports by the chairman of the community board, who always reinforces the idea that life there is absolutely the best anywhere (and who would be lost if he couldn't use the word "vibrant" at least once every report). Finally at the end of a list of about twenty topics come references to reports on what community kids are doing, what seniors there are involved in, and what's going on in the schools - not the kind of priorities I'd want to live my life by......
17 posted on 04/15/2006 9:00:42 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

They need Dr. Pianka as a consultant for 'extra smart' growth.


18 posted on 04/15/2006 9:02:34 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

Me neither. You couldn't pay me to live in a HOA neighborhood. Yet, many people like them ... see them as a protection of their property values.

I'll take the risk the next door neighbor will paint his house pink and put his lawn trimmings in the wrong color bag


19 posted on 04/15/2006 9:20:35 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
I'll take the risk the next door neighbor will paint his house pink and put his lawn trimmings in the wrong color bag...well said - the implication in the operation of most of these communities is that most of the people who live there must be tasteless churls with no sense of aesthetics or the value of their own properties, else why would the community fathers have to spend so much time, energy and money making sure they did the right thing - who would want to live amongst such slobs to begin with ?.......
20 posted on 04/16/2006 8:34:42 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson