That's what happens when you're faced with irrefutable arguments.
When that happens I'll let you know. Instead of an irrefutable argument , you said,
"Moreover, you haven't taken time to study time and compare it with quantum mechanics. The evidence in that regard points to an intersection between time and eternity which in turn, is reason to believe anything goes when it comes to history."
How do you argue with someone who says that any claim about the past is as good as any other? I could provide mountains of evidence and you could just wave it aside and say that anything goes when it comes to history. You're impervious to reason.
No, you're just an artful dodger.