[Coyoteman]

Why should I consider something as "scientific" if it has no human records to attest to the accuracy of its assertions?

There are written records attesting to a global flood. Does this make this claim "scientific?"

[Fester Chugabrew]

There are written records attesting to a global flood. Does this make this claim "scientific?"

Only if the account gives enough detail to fill several volumes, occupy a university library, and contain sufficient Latin terminology.