Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirLinksalot
It's par for the course that "established" scientists hate it when new theories are proposed. They have invested their careers in the old theories.

Then gradually, the new theories start to attract new proponents, who have less at stake in the old theories and are willing to consider new ones.

Younger scientists come into the pool, and they are more open to new ideas as the brain-dead old geezers--scientists, administrators, foundations grants directors--retire or die off.

Thomas Kuhn made a persuasive argument for this process, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.


20 posted on 04/15/2006 12:05:29 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

"It's par for the course that "established" scientists hate it when new theories are proposed."

ID is old and fossilized. The theory of evolution is the newer claim.


30 posted on 04/15/2006 12:13:41 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
It's par for the course that "established" scientists hate it when new theories are proposed.

Propose an alternative theory and we'll entertain it.

223 posted on 04/15/2006 4:33:21 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson