Replies

" Let the name calling begin!"

I didn't start the hostilities.

"To: SirLinksalot

Reasonable article. But expect to get flamed when the evo's catch up!

5 posted on 04/15/2006 2:53:04 PM EDT by guitarist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

And my point was accurate; ID'ers are a bunch of whiny drama queens who thrive on their alleged victim status. No different than the left.

"I see you've shown up on yet another evo thread."

I see you have too, though you have added nothing to this one. At least you're consistent. :)

"So if you don't mind, what exactly are your scientific credentials? What degrees do you hold? Where did you graduate and when?"

It's evidence that wins arguments, not pigskin. I could care less what your creds are, btw, so don't bother posting them. Anybody can make up a degree. Not everybody can make a logical argument.

It's evidence that wins arguments, not pigskin. I could care less what your creds are, btw, so don't bother posting them.

Of course, it is evidence that wins arguments and the lack thereof that loses them. I'm just curious if you actually have personal understanding of the subject through individual study or if you (like many of the evolutionists on these threads) are merely cutting and pasting information from internet websites that you don't fully understand.

Given your propensity to engage in name calling and avoid the logical merits of the debate, I'd have to guess that it is the latter.

A perfect example is the complete lack of empirical evidence for abiogenesis or endosymbiosis. You see, evolutionary theory apart from ID hinges fully on endosymbiotic behavior in the primordial soup. Take that away, and we're still dealing with lightning induced amnio acid formation. Textbooks and credentialed evolutionists admit this...however when IDers and strict creationists point out the utter lack of empirical evidence for this (there's about as much evidence of endosymbiotic behavior as there is for H.G. Well's "War of the Worlds" actually happening) that evolutionists either retreat and say "well, it doesn't matter" or "mitochondrial DNA resemble bacterial DNA so it had to happen" (just like humans resemble chimps so it had to happen, and so on).

There is most definitely no grandeur, but only futility, in a view of life that says that we came about only by chance arrangement of molecules--not by design--and are all headed for the scrap-heap of history a few generations down the road.