![](http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/afp/20060414/capt.sge.jbs68.140406201220.photo00.photo.default-384x267.jpg?x=380&y=264&sig=xJg3wew2XJYQPIv441u5qQ--)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad greets the attendants of a pro-Palestinian conference in Tehran. Iran's hardline leaders fired off a barrage of vitriolic attacks against the United States and Israel, voicing "serious doubts" over the Holocaust and predicting the "elimination" of the Jewish state.(AFP/Behrouz Mehri)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Time to tear them a new one.
2 posted on
04/14/2006 4:42:01 PM PDT by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
To: NormsRevenge
This is a real problem. The Iraqi conflict has sapped the US will for action when necessary. If the US or Israel don't take action soon, it will be too late. This is a much bigger threat than Iraq ever was!
3 posted on
04/14/2006 4:42:40 PM PDT by
al_again
To: NormsRevenge
Iran: The world's next parking lot.
4 posted on
04/14/2006 4:43:30 PM PDT by
quark
To: NormsRevenge
To: NormsRevenge
I would not be surprised that, as we wast time worrying about our inability to deal with these jerks, spec/ops is about 1/2 way to Tehran waiting for the "go" signal.
7 posted on
04/14/2006 4:46:14 PM PDT by
llevrok
(Born a ham but never cured.)
To: NormsRevenge
Yahya, yadda yadda. Eat Shiite, General.
To: NormsRevenge
Bold talk for a Persian faggot.
To: NormsRevenge
Although they remind me of this guy, it is clear that these dudes do not fear us.
![](http://www.darkworks.org/Iraqminister.jpg)
11 posted on
04/14/2006 4:47:26 PM PDT by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: NormsRevenge
![](http://musicmoz.org/img/editors/sounddude/Ringo2.jpg)
Separated at birth?....
To: NormsRevenge
If we take this nut out he wouldn't be around to enjoy it. He needs to be reminded that if we go this one, there will be no Iran unless it is taken over by the Iranian insurgents.
13 posted on
04/14/2006 4:49:17 PM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: NormsRevenge
General Safavi seems to share an opinion widely held among Iranian bigwigs, to wit: that if Israel or the US strikes at Iran, every Shiite in Iraq will spontaneously rise up and crush the American Army there.
I wouldn't bet the masjid on it, myself.
15 posted on
04/14/2006 4:50:41 PM PDT by
Snickersnee
(Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
To: NormsRevenge
![](http://www.neguard.com/unit/192lo/eagle.jpg)
..don't let your alligator mouth write a check your parakeet a$$ can't cover
17 posted on
04/14/2006 4:51:56 PM PDT by
Doogle
(USAF ...7th AF...408MMS..Ubon ,Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery ..AMMO!!)
To: NormsRevenge
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief must give a report at the end of April on Iranian compliance with the Security Council demand. In Tehran he said that after three years of investigations Iran's activities were "still hazy and not very clear." Hazy and not very clear? No wonder the Iranians laugh at the UN and the West and don't take us seriesly. Their actions are as crystal clear as their words.
19 posted on
04/14/2006 4:52:24 PM PDT by
You Dirty Rats
(I Love Free Republic!!!)
To: NormsRevenge
These clowns should think about this. Next year is not an election year. Pres. Bush does not have to be concerned with his own reelection. There is planty of time to mass the air and naval and SF resources necessary to undertake a true lighting war. Not a raid, a war just waged with few boots on the ground and many layers of missiles, precision weapons, and some technological improvements in weaponry that should keep Persia in the dark ages literally for a long time. These people have no idea what they are bringing down on their heads and they are too arrogantly cock sure that their 'American always runs away' model in conjunction with the oil weapon is unbeatable.
But be ready for soaring gas prices unless we wall off strikes on the oil industry as we systematically shred Iranian defense and nuclear capabilities.
To: NormsRevenge
Presumably we could start a bombing campaign that wouldn't involve ground troops at all.
24 posted on
04/14/2006 4:55:10 PM PDT by
wizardoz
To: NormsRevenge
If wars were won with words these guys would be fearsome.
To: NormsRevenge
Wouldn't you just love to walk up to that idiot and say, "Oh just shut up already." Sheesh
To: NormsRevenge
OK, wisea**, couple of one-megaton MIRV's and a dose of neutron bombs courtesy of the B-2 squadron and this p*ssant and his ilk are toasty....
27 posted on
04/14/2006 4:57:14 PM PDT by
PAMadMax
(Islam is the enemy of all mankind...AlJazeera is its PR Firm)
To: NormsRevenge
To: NormsRevenge
I see this a bit differently. I can see a three pronged strike on Iran, Syria and Al-Sadr. The Iranians reaction to any attack would not be conventional. I believe it would be to unleash Hezbolah on Israel and US forces (using Al Sadr as a proxy) in Iraq. I also believe our special forces are in Damascus and Tehran right now pin pointing targets and maybe providing money and support to anti-government forces and in southern Iraq monitoring Mooky Al Sadr. A US/Israeli strike is the most likely scenario. This is my opinion. But then again I am just a St. John's University grad.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson