Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran issues stark military warning to United States
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 4/14/06 | AFP

Posted on 04/14/2006 4:40:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

TEHRAN (AFP) - Iran said it could defeat any American military action over its controversial nuclear drive, in one of the Islamic regime's boldest challenges yet to the United States.

"You can start a war but it won't be you who finishes it," said General Yahya Rahim Safavi, the head of the Revolutionary Guards and among the regime's most powerful figures.

"The Americans know better than anyone that their troops in the region and in Iraq are vulnerable. I would advise them not to commit such a strategic error," he told reporters on the sidelines of a pro-Palestinian conference in Tehran.

The United States accuses Iran of using an atomic energy drive as a mask for weapons development. Last weekend US news reports said President George W. Bush's administration was refining plans for preventive strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.

"I would advise them to first get out of their quagmire in Iraq before getting into an even bigger one," General Safavi said with a grin.

"We have American forces in the region under total surveillance. For the past two years, we have been ready for any scenario, whether sanctions or an attack."

Iran announced this week it had successfully enriched uranium to make nuclear fuel, despite a UN Security Council demand for the sensitive work to be halted by April 28.

The Islamic regime says it only wants to generate atomic energy, but enrichment can be extended to make the fissile core of a nuclear warhead -- something the United States is convinced that "axis of evil" member Iran wants to acquire.

At a Friday prayer sermon in Tehran, senior cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Janati simply branded the US as a "decaying power" lacking the "stamina" to block Iran's ambitions.

And hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told AFP that a US push for tough United Nations sanctions was of "no importance."

"She is free to say whatever she wants," the president replied when asked to respond to comments by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice highlighting part of the UN charter that provides for sanctions backed up by the threat of military action.

"We give no importance to her comments," he said with a broad smile.

On Thursday, Rice said that faced with Iran's intransigence, the United States "will look at the full range of options available to the United Nations."

"There is no doubt that Iran continues to defy the will of the international community," Rice said, after Iran also dismissed a personal appeal from the UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief must give a report at the end of April on Iranian compliance with the Security Council demand. In Tehran he said that after three years of investigations Iran's activities were "still hazy and not very clear."

Although the United States has been prodding the council to take a tough stand against the Islamic republic, including possible sanctions, it has run into opposition from veto-wielding members Russia and China.

Representatives of the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany are to meet in Moscow Tuesday to discuss the crisis.

In seeking to deter international action, Iran has been playing up its oil wealth, its military might in strategic Gulf waters and its influence across the region -- such as in Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories.

At the Tehran conference, Iran continued to thumb its nose at the United States and Israel.

"The Zionist regime is an injustice and by its very nature a permanent threat," Ahmadinejad told the gathering of regime officials, visiting Palestinian militant leaders and foreign sympathizers.

"Whether you like it or not, the Zionist regime is on the road to being eliminated," said Ahmadinejad, whose regime does not recognise Israel and who drew international condemnation last year when he said Israel should be "wiped off the map."

Unfazed by his critics, the hardliner went on to repeat his controversial stance on the Holocaust.

"If there is serious doubt over the Holocaust, there is no doubt over the catastrophe and Holocaust being faced by the Palestinians," said the president, who had previously dismissed as a "myth" the killing of an estimated six million Jews by the Nazis and their allies during World War II.

"I tell the governments who support Zionism to ... let the migrants (Jews) return to their countries of origin. If you think you owe them something, give them some of your land," he said.

Iran's turbaned supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, also accused the United States of seeking to place the entire region under Israeli control.

"The plots by the American government against Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon aimed at governing the Middle East with the control of the Zionist regime will not succeed," Khamenei said.

There was no immediate reaction from Washington, but French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy severely condemned Ahmadinejad for his latest remarks on Israel.

"As I have had occasion to do before, when the Iranian president made similar statements, I condemn these inacceptable remarks in the strongest possible terms," Douste-Blazy said in a statement.

"Israel's right to exist and the reality of the Holocaust should not be disputed," he added.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; irannukes; issues; military; safavi; stark; unitedstates; warning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: al_again
I agree with you 100%, and may I add, we are stretched pretty thin with the Iraq and afgan conflicts. Sure we got cruise missles, and smart bombs, but no war was ever won without troops on the ground.

Iran is not going to go away, and due to this, we are (bleep)-ed...

21 posted on 04/14/2006 4:53:14 PM PDT by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: al_again
LOL! The Iraq conflict has Prepared us for this conflict, and it wasn't an accident.

We now have troops, air bases, and much more important, logistics to wage a devastating war on Iran.

Without Iraqi bases and a quarter million or so troops there, plus aircraft and posrts for close naval supply and assault, it would not be possible without a massive invasion of Iran by Sea.

Saying that we are 'sapped' is like saying that the German armies were 'sapped' by Poland. They could not invade France.

22 posted on 04/14/2006 4:53:32 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Jimmy Carter's legacy.


23 posted on 04/14/2006 4:54:15 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Presumably we could start a bombing campaign that wouldn't involve ground troops at all.


24 posted on 04/14/2006 4:55:10 PM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If wars were won with words these guys would be fearsome.


25 posted on 04/14/2006 4:56:09 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Wouldn't you just love to walk up to that idiot and say, "Oh just shut up already." Sheesh


26 posted on 04/14/2006 4:57:09 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

OK, wisea**, couple of one-megaton MIRV's and a dose of neutron bombs courtesy of the B-2 squadron and this p*ssant and his ilk are toasty....


27 posted on 04/14/2006 4:57:14 PM PDT by PAMadMax (Islam is the enemy of all mankind...AlJazeera is its PR Firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Alright! Thanks.


28 posted on 04/14/2006 4:59:20 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
We now have troops, air bases, and much more important, logistics to wage a devastating war on Iran.

I'm glad you pointed that out because I'm more of a checker-player than chess, and this had not even occurred to me. Duh. Good thing I'm not in charge. My answer to everything since 9/11 has been "Nuke 'em. Next!"

29 posted on 04/14/2006 5:00:23 PM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001

These idiots are starting to get funny. Wonder if any body told him about the two Gulf wars and just how long the Iraqi Army lasted, you know, the one that Iran couldn`t beat in a 10 year war.


30 posted on 04/14/2006 5:00:54 PM PDT by bybybill (RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
Hey, its cool.

Here is something to always remember whenever the drums of war beat.

Amateur soldiers talk tactics, professionals talk logistics.

How do we get men and material there?
How do we supply them, how do we feed them, how do we provide fire support, how do we control the sky, how do we evac the wounded, how do we etc, etc, etc.

Once that nut is cracked, then the tactics can be worked out.
That is something that the Japs never learned in WW11.
31 posted on 04/14/2006 5:08:03 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz

Yes. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HB03Ak02.html


32 posted on 04/14/2006 5:08:05 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
"... it may look like they are goading us, but the truth is, they are asking for it."

Although the United States has been prodding the council to take a tough stand against the Islamic republic, including possible sanctions, it has run into opposition from veto-wielding members Russia and China.

Perhaps there is good reason for their boldness. Perhaps they have allies who are ready to back them up.

33 posted on 04/14/2006 5:08:57 PM PDT by Sweetjustusnow (Mr. President and Representatives, do your duty to uphold our laws or you are all gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Time to finally do away with Executive Order 12333 and smoke check this dude and his cabal.
34 posted on 04/14/2006 5:08:59 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I see this a bit differently. I can see a three pronged strike on Iran, Syria and Al-Sadr. The Iranians reaction to any attack would not be conventional. I believe it would be to unleash Hezbolah on Israel and US forces (using Al Sadr as a proxy) in Iraq. I also believe our special forces are in Damascus and Tehran right now pin pointing targets and maybe providing money and support to anti-government forces and in southern Iraq monitoring Mooky Al Sadr. A US/Israeli strike is the most likely scenario. This is my opinion. But then again I am just a St. John's University grad.
35 posted on 04/14/2006 5:10:12 PM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
A couple of well placed preemptive Nuclear strikes would shut that muttering imbecile right up. Of course he's betting the will of the liberals, in this great country would never allow us to fire a preemptive strike. Saddam Hussein thought we would just sit on are hands also.

Of course with the oil situation, we would certainly have to take more control of Iraq, as a nuclear strike on Iran may cause major problems in the Arab world of the Middle East. It could easily turn into world war three if China gets frustrated over the oil problems. I believe Russia or China would like to have all that oil.

Whatever the picture is over there, the U.S.of A. is really dealing with a total nut case, who needs to be dealt with very soon.
36 posted on 04/14/2006 5:10:35 PM PDT by herkbird (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

*cough* North Korea *cough*


37 posted on 04/14/2006 5:12:17 PM PDT by Windsong (Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Why does all this crap keep coming out of the associated French press??
38 posted on 04/14/2006 5:14:54 PM PDT by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

You know ole Mahmoud is cruisin' for a bruisin', but that's what he wants. He seriously believes he's the Second Coming. He could give a rats a$$ if a million people were killed. He just sees hinself as the leader of a new Islamic order. That's what's scary.


39 posted on 04/14/2006 5:15:22 PM PDT by twoputt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"I tell the governments who support Zionism to ... let the migrants (Jews) return to their countries of origin. If you think you owe them something, give them some of your land," he said.

How much land have those that support the Palestinians in Tehran given them? If they think they owe them something, give them some of your land.

40 posted on 04/14/2006 5:15:22 PM PDT by DejaJude (Admiral Clark said, "Our mantra today is life, liberty and the pursuit of those who threaten it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson