You can present challenges to a guest without inserting opinions. He could have touted the bona fides of the critics. He could have discussed tactical mistakes. No problem. But , when he raises his voice and claims the Administration attempted to convince Americans Saddam was responsible for 9/11, that has no relevance to the discussion at hand. Is a highly opinionated statement and shows his bias.
Shep's supposed to be fair and balanced, not unbiased.
All humans are biased. "Unbiased" journalism is what liberals call their outfits, like the NYT and CBS.
Shep is real, biased, sometimes over the top, but fair and balanced. That's why I like watching his show.
That's the Foxnews way. Its hosts don't have to hide their bias, they just have to allow time for the other side to offer an opposing viewpoint.
The alternative, the CNN and BBC "unbiased" journalists put me to sleep; besides, the "unbiased" reporters are the most biased of them all.
Thank you for your opinion.
not to mention he cant relate how all radical muslims are only working for one thing and all are connected by the (religion of peace) nationality does not matter to them.