Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Secret Tax Hike [Alternative Minimum Tax]
Slate ^ | April 13, 2006 | Daniel Gross

Posted on 04/14/2006 6:15:16 AM PDT by seacapn

This tax season is shaping up as a banner one for the federal government. The strong stock markets have produced a gusher of capital gains taxes. Corporations are continuing to reap massive profits, and so they're paying more in corporate income taxes. Lehman Brothers economist Drew Matus told Barron's that he expects "a 17 percent jump in tax receipts this season (not including regular withholding), and just a 5 percent increase in refunds." The upshot: Tax-season payments could be $59 billion higher than last year.

Should these projections materialize, Republicans will trumpet them as a validation of the supply-side tax-cutting mania. Just reduce taxes on capital and high-earning individuals, and tax revenues will magically leaven. But in fact, the rising revenues may prove exactly the opposite, Democratic point: If you raise taxes on people who make a lot of money, you'll end up with more tax revenues. In addition to windfalls from capital gains and corporate taxes, Matus noted that rising receipts attributable to the Alternative Minimum Tax are filling Washington's coffers. "My suspicion is the AMT has captured a large amount of the tax cut for upper-income earners," he told Barron's. In other words, tax receipts are up in part because many of the rich are paying higher taxes.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alternativeminimum; amt; congress; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
I'm posting this very negative article because it points out something important - the AMT is a very anti-family tax. It penalizes marriage, and it especially penalizes families with children - the AMT punishes people who take "too many" deductions. This is something the Republican Congress needs to address and attack NOW. We heard promises of AMT reform back in 2005... where is it?
1 posted on 04/14/2006 6:15:18 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seacapn

Tell me about it. Monday is check writing day. I was confused by the instructions for the AMT when the first said, "bend over and assume the position".


2 posted on 04/14/2006 6:17:54 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
"We heard promises of AMT reform back in 2005... where is it?"

Heck, I've heard of AMT reform back in 1998. It isn't "Bush's Tax", but this is one of the reasons why I'm so pissed off at the GOP right now. Four years of full control of the federal government and they couldn't do anything about this? Oh, but we can spend billions in feel-good no-child-left behind nonsense and on a bridge to nowhere.

3 posted on 04/14/2006 6:20:42 AM PDT by jjm2111 (http://www.purveryors-of-truth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
This tax season is shaping up as a banner one for the federal government. The strong stock markets have produced a gusher of capital gains taxes. Corporations are continuing to reap massive profits, and so they're paying more in corporate income taxes.

Only when a Republican is president could this type of economic news be viewed as a negative by the media. Slate in MSM obviously, but the clearly reflect the liberal viewpoint.

4 posted on 04/14/2006 6:21:16 AM PDT by IamConservative (Who does not trust a man of principle? A man who has none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
We heard promises of AMT reform back in 2005... where is it?

We were discussing getting rid of the AMT over twenty years ago...back when it was only a nineteen or so billion dollar problem.
5 posted on 04/14/2006 6:23:06 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
I love how Slate frames this as 'Bush's Tax Hike'.. but it's from Slate, everything there is Bush's fault..
6 posted on 04/14/2006 6:23:31 AM PDT by mnehring (NeoCon and Proud of it! - http://abaraxas.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

Yeah right? LOL! I mean come on, Bush cut taxes for the rich and here they are paying more because they earned more. Something you'll never hear on the MSM.


7 posted on 04/14/2006 6:24:39 AM PDT by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Tell me. I got burned for $3,200 of AMT this year and I'm single without any deductions. All it took was a really big capital gain.


8 posted on 04/14/2006 6:26:59 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

That's true. But the thing is, if the AMT suddenly hits 20 million taxpayers on Bush's watch, people will make that connection.


9 posted on 04/14/2006 6:32:26 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

No personal exemptions and a percentage of your itemized deductions, as well as not being able to use home equity like regular Americans equals pure #@%*!$&&!


10 posted on 04/14/2006 6:32:27 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
Just reduce taxes on capital and high-earning individuals, and tax revenues will magically leaven. But in fact, the rising revenues may prove exactly the opposite...

Dear Daniel Gross,

Reducing taxes has ALWAYS resulted in a rising economy and increased federal revenue. EVERY TIME, even when demontrats have done it. (Remember JFK's tax cut?).

What kind of idiot would think Dannie's logic is valid? (Yeah, I know, a Bush hating commie socialist libidiot.)

11 posted on 04/14/2006 6:33:55 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Go home and fix your own country before you complain about ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
Framing this as Bush's Secret Tax is totally ingenuous. The AMT was enacted into law in 1970 when the outcry that their were a few individuals making what was then outrageous amounts of income with no taxes paid, due to some interesting tax shelters.

This tax of course had nothing to do with the so called economic boom and budget balancing during the clinton years.

You can argue this tax any way you want but it is not a Bush tax.

12 posted on 04/14/2006 6:36:48 AM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
I consider it MacCain's tax increase, he sure knew how to protect terrorists by pushing through is anti-torture protection bill but he said screw you tax payers by opposing any making of tax cuts permanent.

Guess maybe he will use that juicy little pretending to be conservative seduction during his prezy self anointment campaign.
13 posted on 04/14/2006 6:38:00 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BIGZ

It's not Bush's tax. But it will become part of his legacy unless he reforms it.


14 posted on 04/14/2006 6:40:33 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

yeh, I made only 79K last year, sold two houses, paid my capital gains, but now owe and EXTRA 11K because the AMT!!!!


Loan time.


15 posted on 04/14/2006 6:41:02 AM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
Granted the AMT is a dumb tax...but here is the key sentence-

"My suspicion is the AMT has captured a large amount of the tax cut for upper-income earners," he told Barron's

This goober is guessing. Just a drive by shot at GWB to negate the good his tax cuts have done.

16 posted on 04/14/2006 6:42:48 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

LOL...we got the same instructions. I told my wife she never does that for me!


17 posted on 04/14/2006 6:44:09 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
Bush didn't institute the AMT and the Congress is unwilling to abolish it as they still cater to the "tax the rich" cries, even as the AMT starts to infiltrate down to the middle class.

I guess that with Bush in the hot seat, folks will blame him for everything until we have Utopiaa, then they'll claim things are too damn good and blame him some more.

18 posted on 04/14/2006 6:45:00 AM PDT by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Exactly...like GWB was the guy who pushed through the AMT...let's see...which congress did that...hmmm...


19 posted on 04/14/2006 6:45:02 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

LOL BUMP! If ya didn't laugh you would cry. It's so damn unfair that I will duct tape my head on Monday to keep my head from blowing up.


20 posted on 04/14/2006 6:46:42 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson