Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Panerai; Larry Lucido; eyespysomething

Sure, they might go after the Mohammedans, but what about Scientology? Parker and Stone wouldn't dare try to do a show about the RELIGION OF HOLLYWEIRD!


2 posted on 04/14/2006 5:12:06 AM PDT by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SittinYonder

where you been hiding? they did scientology.


4 posted on 04/14/2006 5:17:37 AM PDT by Kewlhand`tek (Those that can't , Teach. Those that can't teach , Report)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder
... what about Scientology?

They did Scientology -- and Isaac Hayes quit in protest -- so they killed off Isaac Hayes!

18 posted on 04/14/2006 5:46:24 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder
You’re joking right?

Isaac Hayes (Chef) quit because of an episode called Trapped in the Closet lampooning Tom Cruise and Scientology as a ludicrous cheap science fiction like fraud of a religion. Tom Cruse reportedly threatened to stop promoting MI3 if Viacom (Comedy Central’s parent) re-ran it.

So South Park created a final episode called Chef Returns out of obviously spliced together clips of Chef’s words over the years where he returned from being brainwashed by a cult of child molesters posing as big game hunters. In the end, Chef couldn’t get out from under their spell, fell down a cliff trying to escape and the had his face and body graphically torn apart and eaten by wild animals.

On second thought, that’s pretty ambiguous. They should have come out more strongly against Scientology.

25 posted on 04/14/2006 7:22:55 AM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder

"Sure, they might go after the Mohammedans, but what about Scientology? Parker and Stone wouldn't dare try to do a show about the RELIGION OF HOLLYWEIRD!"

You made the exact same comment over a week ago. If you mean to be sarcastic then the obligatory sarcasm tag (/sarcasm) would be appropriate. If you are not being sarcastic then why post a line about the lack of a Scientology plot that was so easily refuted last time as it is this time.

Do you read responses? Or are you lonely and know that you will get responses because what you propose has already been done?


27 posted on 04/14/2006 7:34:18 AM PDT by torchthemummy ("Reid...Kerry...Rockefeller. They were unable to attend due to a prior lack of commitment." - Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder

ROTFLMAO! You must love the smell of napalm in the morning. :)


28 posted on 04/14/2006 7:36:54 AM PDT by nhoward14 (The missing link is stuffed and mounted in my uncle's den.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder

"but what about Scientology? Parker and Stone wouldn't dare try to do a show about the RELIGION OF HOLLYWEIRD!"


If this ISN'T a joke, then I nominate post #2 in this thread as:

MOST CLUELESS POST OF THE DAY!


43 posted on 04/14/2006 10:34:32 AM PDT by Blzbba (Beauty is just a light switch away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder
Parker and Stone wouldn't dare try to do a show about the RELIGION OF HOLLYWEIRD!

Um, the now famous Scientology episodes are legendary! Tom Cruise in the closet ring a bell?

53 posted on 04/14/2006 10:44:32 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder
Sure, they might go after the Mohammedans, but what about Scientology? Parker and Stone wouldn't dare try to do a show about the RELIGION OF HOLLYWEIRD!

Good show, old man. I expected you to move on after the first half-dozen replies, to soemething like, "Oh, okay, but they'll never do Mormons!" But I guess that's unnecessary, given the multitude of readers who absolutely must reply to your first post without bothering to read the next sixty. Truly, cluelessness runs strong in this thread -- as does the indignation of the clueless when it is pointed out. (Sarcasm tags are for Betelgeusians.)

63 posted on 04/14/2006 11:49:59 AM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SittinYonder

;'}


66 posted on 04/14/2006 1:14:54 PM PDT by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson