To: dukeman
In effect, they have completely dropped the pretension that their sexual-harrassment rules are all about protecting people from, well... sexual harassment. They are using it quite blatantly as a blunt instrument against dissent.
4 posted on
04/13/2006 4:44:42 PM PDT by
coydog
(Cowardice does not make you safe. It makes you a safe target. - - Dale Amon)
To: coydog
The university so far has declined to stop the investigation, saying in its response that it takes “any allegation of sexual harassment seriously.”It's not the nature of the evidence, it's the seriousness of the charge, don't you know . . .
24 posted on
04/13/2006 5:16:34 PM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: coydog
In effect, they have completely dropped the pretension that their sexual-harrassment rules are all about protecting people from, well... sexual harassment. They are using it quite blatantly as a blunt instrument against dissent.
You are correct...but did you expect a different outcome?
68 posted on
04/13/2006 7:48:25 PM PDT by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
To: coydog
"In effect, they have completely dropped the pretension that their sexual-harrassment rules are all about protecting people from, well... sexual harassment. They are using it quite blatantly as a blunt instrument against dissent."
I really can't believe this...blows my mind. I hope this guy can get the attention of some conservative think tanks and/or media and put the spotlight on this garbage of a university. Maybe some conservative group could use this as a test case and finance his legal bills, thereby putting the fear of God into these despicable Marxists.
He should sue for damages.
78 posted on
04/13/2006 8:45:43 PM PDT by
khnyny
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson