How long ago was this? In my assessment you don't seem entirely up-to-date on the theory of evolution.
Your comment proves the points ejroth was making. The theory of evolution is in constant flux because new evidence regularly exposes the flaws of evolution, which requires an even greater imagination to maintain ones faith in evolution.
Evolution is based on a lie, and as the lies become exposed, more and bigger lies are requires to cover over or hide the earlier lies.
Really? Seems to me that the theory of evolution has remained pretty much exactly the same since it was merged with genetics into the Modern Synthesis of the 1930s. I'm sure you know better.
Wrong.
and as the lies become exposed,
Wrong again. No "lies" affecting the validity of evolutionary biology have been "exposed". A *ton* of anti-evolution lies and screwups have been documented, though (see my previous post for documentation), but the AECreationists don't seem to mind at all, probably because they're not all that concerned about little incidentals like "truth" and "facts".
more and bigger lies are requires to cover over or hide the earlier lies.
Strike three, you're out, and so is your credibilty.
Come back when you have some actual material you can document instead of your standard rambling rants which bear little if any resemblance to reality.
Or heck, if you're going to rant, at least *try* to give specific examples for your allegations, so that we can all have a good laugh and document how clueless/dishonest you're being. When all you do is make vague and general slanders, they're so pointless that it's not even fun to kick them around. It's like a liberal moonbat screaming, "capitalism is evil!" Um, okay, fine, now go take your medications. At least if if they tried to say what they thought they were *basing* their claim on, you could make their head explode by demonstrating that their claimed "facts" were horse manure. But with something as vague as "capitalism is evil!" or "evolution is based on a lie!", all you can do is shake your head and make sure they're not allowed near any pointy objects.
Hardly. Suppose he got his degree in the 50's. During this time the DNA double helix was discovered. The discovery of the structure of DNA cast great light on the process of evolution. If he got his degree in the 50's he may have learned a good amount about biochemistry, but nothing about genetics. We have made immense advances in genetics since this time, so a person who finished his education 50 years ago would need to do a lot of independent reading to catch up. Even in the 60's things were just starting to get on a roll in this field.
If you don't realize this and if you really think we're just sitting around making up lies, I suppose you don't really know anything about science either.
Inquiring minds want to know: Upon what lie is evolution based?
I thought we were not supposed to use the word 'lie' anymore..yet you have managed to use the word 4 times in one sentence, which sentence appears to be nothing more, than a lot of general whining, and boo-hooing over evolution...specifics are needed...what are these lies you speak of?..do provide specific examples, links, and real evidence...
I am sure we will all be waiting for you to come forward with specific examples of what these 'lies' are...
You seem to denigrate a field of study, which may be in flux, according to your own estimations?...do you apply that standard to all fields of study?...like medicine?...if the field of medicine were not in constant flux, we would still be bleeding people to cure them of what ails them, rather than getting them good effective medicine...medical personel would not be washing their hands when dealing with patients because, heck, who wants to believe that here are actually microbes, which if not killed, could cause infection in a patient...heck, lets do away with anesthesia, who needs it, we will just do it the old way, and get the patient drunk, before amputating his leg...heck, lets do away with immunizations, because those who get those terrible diseases which immunizations prevent, are receiving a just curse, for something awful they have done...just lets denigrate flux in any field of study, and let the chips fall where they may...
Flux in fields of study, uncovering of new evidence in those fields of study, new technologies, new knowledge seems to frighten you...Flux in many fields of study, adds new knowledge to that field, makes that field more true, more beneficial to all concerned...
To you, it seems, flux is bad...Or is flux only bad where you see it in evolution, a field of study, which you seem to hate?
I find your view to be a sad one...