To: jennyp; js1138; Alter Kaker
This is second time I've heard about this "DNA's missing link" stuff. Is this the birth of a new talking point?
104 posted on
04/13/2006 3:19:04 PM PDT by
Sofa King
(A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
To: Sofa King
This is second time I've heard about this "DNA's missing link" stuff. Is this the birth of a new talking point?I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. I'm sure Dr. Dino or his ilk will eventually explain the talking point.
109 posted on
04/13/2006 3:25:02 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Sofa King
This is second time I've heard about this "DNA's missing link" stuff. Is this the birth of a new talking point?Unless we have a complete genome for every individual living thing that ever existed, we will always have missing links. and the more links we find, the more links will be missing.
The quesiion I like to see addressed is, which explanatory hypothesis expects to find intermediates, and which explanatory hypothesis has a basis for predicting the features of new fossil finds?
134 posted on
04/13/2006 3:54:38 PM PDT by
js1138
(~()):~)>)
To: Sofa King; jennyp; js1138; Alter Kaker
This is second time I've heard about this "DNA's missing link" stuff. Is this the birth of a new talking point? I asked this Darwinist to explain how Evolution could be possible in the face of "DNA's missing link", and he couldn't answer me. Praze Be!
305 posted on
04/13/2006 9:04:17 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(A pessimist is what an optimist calls a realist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson