Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt's 'No' on Iraq 'Occupation' Good for Today Show Invite
Today Show/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 04/13/2006 5:12:18 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

EGO

Republican and even conservative politicians have to know their MSM appearances will be used against Bush and the party. Spector is one of the worst EGO driven politicians who often makes anti-Bush statements just to get himself some air and ink. John McCain uses this ploy better than anyone.

The democrats have their Obama and to a worse degree, Harold Ford, Jr. These two feign non-partisanship, tease the media, then always tow the the party line when push comes to shove.

Gingrich, unbelievably, incredibly, really is running for president, so he's a whore for any MSM attention he can get.


21 posted on 04/13/2006 6:29:12 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Absolutely. Laura was outstanding, I loved when she called Today out. Newt's problem is he is looking for a future in politics, and he believes he has to appear on lame lib shows like Today to talk "sense" into the lefty viewers. Opportunity to turn the tables squandered.

Won't work, most viewers of Today will never pull an "R" lever unless Lincoln Chafee runs.


22 posted on 04/13/2006 6:33:23 AM PDT by soloNYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Sounds like Newit is trying to play both sides of the fence

Wrong. What he said was Iraq should have been handled more like Afghanistan, where we put locals up front and in charge from the beginning. Paul Bremmer took a different tact in Iraq by not immediately putting Iraqis in charge and this allowed the insurgency to grow because we appeared to be an occupying force, rather than a liberating force. Read the entire speech. It's really pretty clear what he said.

23 posted on 04/13/2006 6:53:48 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
"What he said was Iraq SHOULD HAVE BEEN..." [caps added]

IMHO, that is the point. Why bother saying what "should have been", when it undermines the President and the troops, except for political purposes?

24 posted on 04/13/2006 7:12:18 AM PDT by LZ_Bayonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
It's really pretty clear what he said.

It's what he said about President Bush on the Today Show, not what he said about Bremmer, that's counter productive for the rest of President Bush's term.

And I misspoke when I said his voice is to high. It's too soft.

25 posted on 04/13/2006 12:05:49 PM PDT by AmericaUnite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson