Skip to comments.
Sean Hannity Show Live Thread Wednesday 12 April 2006
Hannity.com and other stations ^
| 12 April 2006
| Hannity and FReepers
Posted on 04/12/2006 12:00:31 PM PDT by hattend
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-179 last
To: eeevil conservative
I'm sure the dogs and wolfs wanna barf too.
To: eeevil conservative
Jesse Lee should eat this lawyer for lunch.
162
posted on
04/12/2006 2:35:54 PM PDT
by
hattend
(I have a pig list. Do you want on it?)
To: Txsleuth
say hi to everyone at the Lounge tonight...
gotta run to another meeting...
163
posted on
04/12/2006 2:36:02 PM PDT
by
eeevil conservative
(I'm not racist- I'm an Equal Opportunity Enemy of ALL LAWBREAKING, TAX DODGING, FENCE CLIMBERS!)
To: hattend
I wonder if jurors even consider anything that mitigates the company employee's actions...or is the reaction knee-jerk when there is even a hint of profiling. Having said that, if profiling is a policy of the anti-terrorism task force, and they would be crazy if they did not, why is it not enshrined in law?
Either it is or isn't acceptable...
164
posted on
04/12/2006 2:37:44 PM PDT
by
sofaman
("The Argument from Intimidation is a confession of intellectual impotence." Ayn Rand)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Another voice that makes my ears bleed.
To: ChicagoConservative27
What a lawyer. Equating an accidental hunting accident to a premeditated assault.
166
posted on
04/12/2006 2:43:39 PM PDT
by
hattend
(I have a pig list. Do you want on it?)
To: hattend
To: ChicagoConservative27
The lawyer guy is all over the map...LOL!!!
168
posted on
04/12/2006 2:46:22 PM PDT
by
hattend
(I have a pig list. Do you want on it?)
To: ChicagoConservative27
169
posted on
04/12/2006 2:47:49 PM PDT
by
sono
("If Congressional brains were cargo, there'd be nothing to unload." - Rush Limbaugh)
To: hattend
Excuse after excuse for McKinney. I guess this lawyer thinks that McKinney should take no responsibility for her actions.
To: hattend
There was no blood! He did not get hurt!
What a lawyer, no wonder our laws are ignored with people like him coming out of law schools.
171
posted on
04/12/2006 2:48:04 PM PDT
by
hattend
(I have a pig list. Do you want on it?)
To: hattend
Don't you know that it wasn't an accident???
172
posted on
04/12/2006 2:49:48 PM PDT
by
acsrp38
(I was born an American, I will live as an American, I will die as an American, God Bless the USA)
To: sofaman
"..it's someone else's SSN"We should be able to put together an employer funded ($ per entry) Federal database with enough general descriptive information (gender,age,state of residence [not seen by employer]), to at least trigger "Requires Further Confirming Data", in response to descriptive data first entered by the employer. This would trip up the vast majority of the illegals.
Then, the now "unconfirmed" applicant would be required, at their expense (at the same type of automated fingerprint vendors currently doing this for teacher and other applicants) to submit their fingerprints so that Federal investigators can quickly and efficiently make a comparison with the SSN holder of record (this isn't really going to happen, unless there is a legitimate problem, because the illegal will never go to the automated fingerprint collection vendor).
BTW- Three things in order to prevent a conspirator employed at an employer's HR office from running SS numbers until they get an acceptance 1)Charging for each query, with an auditable Federal report back to the employer. 2) A requirement that a completed employment application (whether eventually employed or not) be kept on hand for a specific time (forcing a complete application for each SSN query). 3)Strict penalities for attempting to beat the system. If employers don't like to do it? Allow commerical vendor's (like those currently taking teacher etc. prints) to qualify people.
To: Txsleuth
I heard some talk about it while the radio was on earlier.....not the whole story......and my heart skipped a beat. That would truly be the ultimate betrayal if Rummy was asked to leave.
Just heard too that it was the State Department who decided that the mobile biological weapons trailers were innocent. Not national security.
Who in their right mind does not know that the State Department is full of evil America hating moles planted there by Carter and Clinton.
174
posted on
04/12/2006 2:59:52 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Txsleuth
At this point, I have a headache and a stomachache.
175
posted on
04/12/2006 3:01:36 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: OldFriend
That proves it. If the State Dept said it, it's a lie. Those people... Some have been there for decades, and they seem to attract a certain type of creature. THANK goodness for Bolton at the UN, though.
To: OldFriend
Alka-Seltzer works for me...>LOL
And turning off the news!
To: PghBaldy
Just reading that Mayor Blooming-idiot wants to build a new facility for the UN.
I'd like to see them all a bit further south. Such as Guantanamo Bay.
178
posted on
04/12/2006 5:14:43 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: LibertyLee
Welcome back, Liberty. I hope you’re doing all right.
179
posted on
04/12/2007 12:05:45 PM PDT
by
American Quilter
(You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-179 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson