Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Chiefs Don't Want Immigrants Charged [losing their spine - Hastert, Frist...]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 04/11/2006 4:43:58 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

GOP Chiefs Don't Want Immigrants Charged

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent 29 minutes ago

The two top Republicans in Congress, confronted with internal party divisions as well as large public demonstrations, said Tuesday they intend to pass immigration legislation that does not subject illegal aliens to prosecution as felons.

A written statement by Speaker Dennis Hastert of Illinois and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee, did not say whether they would seek legislation subjecting illegal immigrants to misdemeanor prosecution or possibly a civil penalty such as a fine.

"It remains our intent to produce a strong border security bill that will not make unlawful presence in the United States a felony," the two men said. An estimated 11 million men, women and children are in the United States illegally.

The Republican-controlled House passed legislation late last year that is generally limited to border security measures. It makes illegal immigrants subject to felony prosecution.

Senate efforts to write a broader bill — covering border security, a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for many of the 11 million in the country illegally — are gridlocked with lawmakers on a two-week vacation.

Frist has said he intends to bring the issue back to the Senate floor, although he stopped short of a flat commitment and the prospects for passage of an election-year immigration bill are uncertain.

The late-afternoon statement by the top GOP leaders in both houses came after days of large street demonstrations by protestors opposed to criminal penalties for illegal immigrants.

Additionally, in a Washington Post-ABC News poll published during the day, only 20 percent of those questioned said they favored declaring illegal immigrants to be felons

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; coddlingillegals; firefirst; firefrist; firehastert; folded; forcheaplabor; frist; hastert; screwedbytherinos; sellingoutamerica; soldoutcheap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: stopem
It doesn't really matter if its a felony or a misdemenor is they get deported either way.

Yesterday there were over a thousand illegal protesters on the quad at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign. From what I saw almost no students, so that means in an area with only around 200,000 people there are over 1000 illegals there who had enough time off to go into town and protest. This is central Illinois, not a border state.
21 posted on 04/11/2006 5:01:07 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Number57

I hope the GOP enjoys its minority status come January.


22 posted on 04/11/2006 5:02:02 PM PDT by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The illegal-immigration issue is no longer an issue. Its now an immigrant-benefit bill and its a great big snowball rolling down the hill to passage.

The next battle will be in the streets

23 posted on 04/11/2006 5:05:37 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Get legal or get out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
The "people" have already spoken. Not the American citizens but the mob that the sniveling, spineless legislators fear and obey.
24 posted on 04/11/2006 5:05:39 PM PDT by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

You have to charge them for specific crimes. You can't just assume they are guilty of violations. The only way this is going to happen is to task city and state police officers to arrest and identify them. If someone who has committed a crime is shown to be illegal, then he/she may be prosecuted for the crime/deported. I think this is happening on a small scale. but my understanding is that cops don't want to do this work.


25 posted on 04/11/2006 5:07:22 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
From "Don't Tread on Me!" to "We Cannot Criminalize these Criminals!" in two short centuries.

America, we hardly knew ye...

¡Hola, Amexica!

26 posted on 04/11/2006 5:07:35 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
castrati
27 posted on 04/11/2006 5:08:53 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

before we all go off the deep end.

strong enforcement provisions of any bill that emerges, need NOT declare these people as felons. its pointless, we aren't going to deport them all at gunpoint. remember, the Dems voted to keep this in the house bill to trap the republicans.


28 posted on 04/11/2006 5:10:59 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isrul
The "people" have already spoken. Not the American citizens but the mob that the sniveling, spineless legislators fear and obey.

Bingo.

In Spain, they listen and obey when the criminals blow up a train station.

In France, they listen and obey when the criminals set some cars on fire.

In America, they listen and obey when the criminals mill in the streets and say "we demand that you obey us!"

We have relinquished the right to scold the Europeans for caving to the terrorists. THEY can now laugh at US. We have given up the high moral ground, in exchange for cheep lay-bor.

We have made ourselves into the contemptible laughingstock of the world.

29 posted on 04/11/2006 5:11:15 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I think you guys are overreacting to this particular statement. The fact is that it would be impossible to prosecute them as felons because they would have a right to a jury trial which is impractical for 12 million aliens. Plus, felon means they could serve more than a year in jail- do you think we have enough jail space for that? They can still be prosecuted and deported for misdemeanors.

Don't get me wrong- I fully expect Hastert and Frist to sell us out eventually. They just didn't do so in this statement.


30 posted on 04/11/2006 5:11:26 PM PDT by Altair333 (Please no more 'Bush's fault' posts- the joke is incredibly old)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
We lost. It is over. I guess I am old enough to just sit back and wait so I can laugh in another 20 years when its up to 35 million and they are 33% of the voter population....

Check your math. More likely, it'll be 100 million in five years. Really.

31 posted on 04/11/2006 5:12:34 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
So charge them with income tax evasion the day they walk in for the amnesty, or else absolve them of all the crimes they committed, and then explain that to the ordinary American.

I keep seeing commercials for tax attorneys, offering to help people who are behind in their taxes.

If the criminal aliens are given tax amnesty, will AMERICAN citizens get a SIMILAR tax amnesty too?

Or will it be once again, "Advantage, Mexico"?

32 posted on 04/11/2006 5:15:12 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

I can go along with that. I still can't see the feasibility of trying to deport millions of illegals.

Sealing the borders must be first though.


33 posted on 04/11/2006 5:15:58 PM PDT by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Altair333
The fact is that it would be impossible to prosecute them as felons because they would have a right to a jury trial which is impractical for 12 million aliens.

With respect, I believe that you might be missing the point. If illegal aliens are committing a felony by being here, that is a continuing offense. And this means that those who help them remain here, are aiding and abetting a felon in the commission of his / her felony.

34 posted on 04/11/2006 5:16:08 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I don't think they could pass a law that would suddenly turn every illegal already here into a felon.

That would be an ex-post-facto law which is expressly prohibited by the Constitution.

35 posted on 04/11/2006 5:17:27 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Can't lose what they never had, a spine, or jewels.


36 posted on 04/11/2006 5:17:41 PM PDT by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Or will it be once again, "Advantage, Mexico"?

I think you know the answer to that.

37 posted on 04/11/2006 5:18:38 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest

so what? we aren't going to forcibly deport 12 million people through the law enforcement process - get over it. by calling congress and asking for that, we are marginalizing ourselves. we want amnesty stopped, we want border security. we have to stop new entrants from getting in, incentivize/penalize the labor system here to deny them jobs so they deport themselves, and look carefully at who is here and consider legalizing some modest percentage of those where it makes sense (those with US citizen children and property owners, for example).


38 posted on 04/11/2006 5:19:17 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37; Sub-Driver
If they can avoid calling them criminals they should. This is a simple matter of logistics. IF they could be called felons the scumbags that will be coaching them could get themselves 100,000 kamikazes and completely swamp our court system.

You missed the point -- by a country mile.

If they are declared felons, then they CANNOT VOTE.

Keep reading that line over and over until the light goes on over your head. You will then seen the reason they will NOT let these "wonderful people" be "labeled as criminals."

If they can't go a-whoring after their VOTES, then the only reason to bring them in, is to satisfy their deep-pocketed donation-machines who want the cheeeep lay-bor. The whole "but what's in it for ME?" factor goes right out the window.

39 posted on 04/11/2006 5:19:19 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan; Sub-Driver
I am not going to be depressed if we lose in November because it will not surprise me one bit if we lose.

Judging by what we get when we "win", I'd say that any more "victories" like this and we're finished!

I'm just kidding, though. We're already finished.

40 posted on 04/11/2006 5:21:16 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson