Skip to comments.
Gun maker [Smith and Wesson] banks on Pentagon
International Herald Tribune ^
| 11 April 2006
| Leslie Wayne
Posted on 04/11/2006 12:53:48 PM PDT by 45Auto
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: 45Auto
S&W really dropped the ball in NC. They had a large order of revolvers, sold to the corrections department, actually start to fall apart in the space of a year or so. They should have moved quickly to replace them with the new M&P, instead they waited till it was on the front page of the papers before even taking notice.
21
posted on
04/11/2006 1:19:47 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: ExcursionGuy84
22
posted on
04/11/2006 1:20:25 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: 45Auto
"Smith & Wesson is coming back to life, thanks to an expanding Pentagon budget and growing spending by the Homeland Security Department."
go Clinton and Wesson !! /sarc
23
posted on
04/11/2006 1:21:11 PM PDT
by
stompk
To: ExcursionGuy84; ozzymandus
The model 29 shots a 44 magnum. The Smiths are nice guns, but the more powerful handgun rounds rattle your teeth, a Model 58 in 41 magnum might draw blood. I think the Rugers both Blackhawk and Redhawk are more comfortable to shoot, and a Bisley Blackhawk can be shot all day. That's my opinion there, probably worth about what you paid for it.
To: ExcursionGuy84
A model 29 is a 44 magnum revolver. A 44 bullet actually measures .429 inch.
The 29 is what Clint Eastwood carried in "Dirty Harry."
Prior to that movie the S&W M29 sold for about $250, retail. After the movie the 6.5 inch barrel 29 sold for $500, if you could find one.
I've owned several. Now only own one (6.5 inch barrel) but am looking for one in four inch barrel.
25
posted on
04/11/2006 1:22:51 PM PDT
by
LouAvul
To: 45Auto
Regardless of the maker, isn't the issue that the Euro wimp 9MM's do not have enough knock down power for close combat as is the "norm" in the middle east (rather than an officer's gun during the cold war)?
In other words, the .45 cal = Slow but Blow
26
posted on
04/11/2006 1:24:47 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(Born a ham but never cured.)
To: 45Auto
Great. Now, if they can figure out how to chamber an auto with their .500 or .460 loads, I'll have my sights set on purchasing one.
I don't need another 9mm and I won't buy a .40. I was looking into a two-tone Springfield XD in .45 ACP for my Wife. Maybe if S&W has decently priced offering there..
27
posted on
04/11/2006 1:25:04 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
To: absolootezer0
Yeah... I just find the whole double-action concept silly. The trigger pull should be the same EVERY TIME. So, DA only, or SA, is the only way to go.
28
posted on
04/11/2006 1:28:20 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: ozzymandus
The only S&W I own is a WWII cherry Victory Model 38. I decided a few years back during the Clinton Occupation that I'd never 'buy' a current S&W because of their capitulation to the anit-gun movement. They are a northern based company with northern thinking employees who probably are voting Democratic.
29
posted on
04/11/2006 1:31:21 PM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: Dead Corpse
I don't need another 9mm and I won't buy a .40. I was looking into a two-tone Springfield XD in .45 ACP for my Wife. Maybe if S&W has decently priced offering there.. I got to shoot a buddies XD in .45 this weekend. Points real nice and felt good in the hand. The grip may be a bit stout for small hands.
30
posted on
04/11/2006 1:36:47 PM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Rodney King
S&W makes a heluva 1911 clone...thing is damn near a nail-driver...
31
posted on
04/11/2006 1:37:03 PM PDT
by
Andonius_99
(They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
To: TC Rider
I'm thinkin', I'm thinkin'...I don't know why but I'm thinkin'.
32
posted on
04/11/2006 1:39:13 PM PDT
by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: Dixie Yooper
"only need one handgun"
Sacrilege!
33
posted on
04/11/2006 1:40:14 PM PDT
by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: thinkthenpost
...a Model 58 in 41 magnum might draw blood. Actually, I happened to read an article in Boar Hunter magazine a few months past that exalted the virutes of the .41 as a perfect compromise between .357 and .44;
a good, plain "do-anything-anywhere-anytime" revolver.
34
posted on
04/11/2006 1:41:28 PM PDT
by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: TC Rider
I picked one up off a table at Saxet last month. It does have good point, but the grip was a bit small for my hands. It'd be good for hers though. She has those gorgeous long fingered "ring model" type hands. Fairly strong, although I still end up opening most of the bottles/jars around the house.
It's the fairly compact size coupled with a decent sized round in a no nonsense package that I liked. That, and it has nothing to do with one of Gaston's drastic plastic pieces.
35
posted on
04/11/2006 1:43:31 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
To: 45Auto
"...new chief executive, Michael Golden, who once sold power tools for Black & Decker ...."
A prototype for a new S&W handgun?
To: Dixie Yooper
I have always liked S&W revolvers but only need one handgun. My exact sentiments last year when I first took a pistol course. Before I knew it, I had five handguns in the safe (just in the last month I got an XD in .45 ACP and a full-size 1911 - the S&W revolver was number three out of the five). Do I really 'need' all of them? No, not really, but it's a good way to improve my competence with firearms to be exposed to the different models...
37
posted on
04/11/2006 1:47:35 PM PDT
by
Zeppo
To: LouAvul
A model 29 is a 44 magnum revolver. A 44 bullet actually measures .429 inch. The 29 is what Clint Eastwood carried in "Dirty Harry." Prior to that movie the S&W M29 sold for about $250, retail. After the movie the 6.5 inch barrel 29 sold for $500, if you could find one.
two little bits of trivia. first, eastwood shot specials, not magnums. second, shortly after dirty harry the market was suddenly flooded with "slightly used" 29s. friend of mine picked up a 29dx that was described as "cylinder loaded once, one round fired." i won't tell you the obscene (low) price he got it for.
38
posted on
04/11/2006 1:48:15 PM PDT
by
absolootezer0
("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
To: ozzymandus
Hey now I own a 500 and a 460 xvr and they are awesome in the field for deer and the 460 shoots 45 long colts all day very enjoyable.
39
posted on
04/11/2006 1:50:13 PM PDT
by
lakeman
(when a marine kills the only thing he feels is the recoil of his rifle)
To: 45Auto
My choice would be the re-issued Schofield Model 3...
40
posted on
04/11/2006 1:50:44 PM PDT
by
rahbert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson