To: conserv13
|
I don't even think that you can call Playboy 'pornography'. I have to agree with you on that statement. If 1950's Playboy was pornography what the hell do we call the statue of David? |
49 posted on
04/11/2006 8:00:59 AM PDT by
HawaiianGecko
(Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
To: HawaiianGecko
"If 1950's Playboy was pornography what the hell do we call the statue of David?"
Wishful thinking???
66 posted on
04/11/2006 8:08:57 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: HawaiianGecko
Exactly, Playboy especially in the fifties by todays standards would probably be rated PG-13. Even today It's just naked women as a posed to hard core smut in magazines like penthouse hustler etc. I don't care for Hefner that much mainly because an old man in his pj's who cant let go of the glory days is just rather sad.
102 posted on
04/11/2006 8:43:52 AM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
To: HawaiianGecko
"what the hell do we call the statue of David?"
You sir, are a dolt!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson